On 1/15/22 8:30 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
Ummm ….. e ….. somebody … errr … got you a deal on
those parts … errr ….
Bob
Indeed. But they were also, I think, some of the first 100MHz
versions. $400 each, in 2015. They worked just fine.
Same mission we had the CSAC on (one goal was to co
Hi
Ummm ….. e ….. somebody … errr … got you a deal on
those parts … errr ….
Bob
> On Jan 15, 2022, at 10:01 AM, Lux, Jim wrote:
>
> On 1/14/22 3:40 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The design traces back to the Efratom “EMXO” from the 1980’s.
>> Vectron bought the rights to that design an
| BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
> incompetence.
> > ___
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.fe
Hi
The design traces back to the Efratom “EMXO” from the 1980’s.
Vectron bought the rights to that design and produced examples
of it for about a decade or so.
Bob
> On Jan 14, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:44:22 +
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:20:03 +0100
Attila Kinali wrote:
> Then I looked at the Datasheet [1] (ok appnote) and guess what,
> that's no mere oscillator. That's a bona-fide OCXO. Vacuum packaged,
> nonetheless! Sure, it doesn't have the best stability compared to
> other OCXO, but compared to other
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:44:22 +
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> https://twitter.com/EvilMnkyzDsignz/status/1482039903995273216
Now that's an interesting design.
My first thought was, "hell, using /two/ ceramic carriers
for PCBs and using gold wires to connect them to eachother,
that must hav
Hi
Just over 12 years old when he chopped it open.
Bob
> On Jan 14, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> With high praise for aesthetics even:
>
> https://twitter.com/EvilMnkyzDsignz/status/1482039903995273216
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>
