Perrier,
It's a good question.
Better setups use various forms of calibration methods to compensate for
systematic biases. This can be done for instance by insertion generated
side-band signals from a separate generator, where the power and offset
frequency is set and a know relationship of what
With hot and cold noise sources perhaps?
Bruce
> On 24 August 2019 at 07:07 Perry Sandeen via time-nuts
> wrote:
>
>
> Gentlemen,
> A question for my curiosity and education. Traditionally, the standard was
> 10X better than what was being calibrated.
>
> Since this is at the theoretical
Gentlemen,
A question for my curiosity and education. Traditionally, the standard was 10X
better than what was being calibrated.
Since this is at the theoretical limit, how might it be calibrated so the
numbers provided are accurate?
Regards,
Perrier
