Re: [time-nuts] clocks for amateur radio and astronomy (was: World's most precise.... wall clock)

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:21 PM Bruce Griffiths wrote: > > Unless something akin to VLBI or pulsar timing is involved millisecond > accuracy will usually suffice for amateur astronomy. I think some of the most demanding requirements for optical astronomy by amateur/semi-pros are set by

Re: [time-nuts] clocks for amateur radio and astronomy (was: World's most precise.... wall clock)

Unless something akin to VLBI or pulsar timing is involved millisecond accuracy will usually suffice for amateur astronomy. Bruce > On 11 March 2021 at 06:31 Bob kb8tq wrote: > > > Hi > > > On Mar 10, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:39:46 -0800 > >

Re: [time-nuts] clocks for amateur radio and astronomy (was: World's most precise.... wall clock)

Hi > On Mar 10, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:39:46 -0800 > "Charlie" wrote: > >> My question is thus: It seems that procuring a more precise PPS/time output >> unit is quite a bit more costly than what I have; even more costly is a unit >> that has both

[time-nuts] clocks for amateur radio and astronomy (was: World's most precise.... wall clock)

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:39:46 -0800 "Charlie" wrote: > My question is thus: It seems that procuring a more precise PPS/time output > unit is quite a bit more costly than what I have; even more costly is a unit > that has both more precise PPS/time output, The question is more whether it is good