Hi,
On 08/22/2018 12:01 AM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
> I have Wolaver's book, and it mostly seems pretty readable. Wolaver also
> describes
> a technique for extending the linear phase range of the classic "digital
> phase/freq" detector
> to several cycles, not just the usual one-cycle range.
Yes.
Hi
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 01:15:10AM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:26:03 +0200
>> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>>
Yeah. u-blox isn't as nice as they used to be to small customers :-(
>>>
>>> Ah,
Hi
> On Aug 19, 2018, at 5:26 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:45:30 +0200
>> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>>
>>> The main issue I'm running into is that most timing GPS modules will
>>> happily
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:13:49PM +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> >> 2) replace the internal oscillator with one phase locked to your OCXO.
> >> [...]
> >
> > If you go this route, the close in phase noise of your signal needs to be
> > in the
> > “pretty good TCXO” range. There are indeed
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:45:30 +0200
> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>
> > The main issue I'm running into is that most timing GPS modules will
> > happily give you carrier phase measurements... for their internal
> > oscillator, and
Hi,
On 08/18/2018 10:01 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
>> On Aug 18, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:45:30 +0200
>> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>>
>>> The main issue I'm running into is that most timing GPS modules will
>>> happily give you carrier phase
Hi
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:45:30 +0200
> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>
>> The main issue I'm running into is that most timing GPS modules will
>> happily give you carrier phase measurements... for their internal
>> oscillator, and the
