Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2019-01-02 Thread Brooke Clarke
>>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>    time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44 >>>> Message: 7 >>>> Date

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2019-01-01 Thread David G. McGaw
It appears Canada tries to match the US to save confusion.  The US changed the dates starting in 2007 (making clocks in earlier systems like VCRs obsolete) and Canada followed suit.  Who knows what Congress will do in the future (abolish DST?  I hope!), so programming a system to be good to

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2019-01-01 Thread Graham / KE9H
> Does anybody know how many other places use the same rules? What does Canada do? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_by_country --- Graham == On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 4:05 PM Hal Murray wrote: > > > GPS has no bits for Daylight Savings. As far as I know only WWV and WWVB > >

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2019-01-01 Thread Hal Murray
> GPS has no bits for Daylight Savings.  As far as I know only WWV and WWVB > have those bits. So for a clock displaying local time WWVB is the way to go. WWVB's DST data is targeted at the US. Does anybody know how many other places use the same rules? What does Canada do? Has anybody

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2019-01-01 Thread Brooke Clarke
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com wrote: time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44 Message: 7 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:04:22 -0800 From: "Tom Van Baak" To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Subject: Re: [time-n

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Bob kb8tq
gt; >>>> Brooke Clarke >>>> https://www.PRC68.com >>>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html >>>> axioms: >>>> 1. The extent to which you can fix or improve something will be limited >> by >>>> how well yo

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Wayne Holder
well you understand how it works. > >> 2. Everybody, with no exceptions, holds false beliefs. > >> > >> ---- Original Message > >>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com > >>> wrote: > &g

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Bob kb8tq
it works. >> 2. Everybody, with no exceptions, holds false beliefs. >> >> Original Message >>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44 >>>

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Wayne Holder
te: > > > >> time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44 > >> Message: 7 > >> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:04:22 -0800 > >> From: "Tom Van Baak" > >> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > >> > >&g

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread paul swed
age: 7 > > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:04:22 -0800 > > From: "Tom Van Baak" > > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > > > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements > > Message-ID: <96BB388753294278

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Joseph Gwinn
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com wrote: > time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44 > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:04:22 -0800 > From: "Tom Van Baak" > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread paul swed
This is good work and I have been following. What caught my attention was the 2 X very fast codes. I remember talking to the everset folks early on and the high speed code could be turned on. It had not been. The ES100 will not track that code as mentioned. Did not think they actually ever turned

Re: [time-nuts] More ES100 WWVB Measurements

2018-12-31 Thread Tom Van Baak
Hi Graham, That's very nice work. And you have uncovered several unusual effects in the ES100. Bugs? Features? If we time nuts keep up the good work to evaluate this chip, we are likely at some point to get an informative response from the guys who designed it. They read time-nuts. So now