Moin,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:33:45 -0800
wrote:
> Well I have been looking at the data in the
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325499937_A_portable_cold_87_Rb_
> atomic_clock_with_frequency_instability_at_one_day_in_the_10-15_range
>
> link and find that maybe they are
Hi
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 11:18 PM, cdel...@juno.com wrote:
>
> The pressure sensitivity for a classic design can easily be eliminated.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the old Varian R20 cell was mostly immune.
>
> Either using the R20 design or stiffer convex ends in a modern design
> would work.
>
>
Hi,
On 2019-11-09 08:05, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message , cdel...@juno.com writes:
>
> [long list of all the work to be done before the classical gas-cell Rb
> improves materially]
>
> You are sort of making my point here Corby.
>
> It is not like people have not been improving
From: Hal Murray
Your graph says peer delay. Do you have rawstats? The peer level has done
some filtering. It would be interesting to see if the difference is visible
to the eye on a graph.
===
Sorry, I don't have rawstats, but give a bit of time I could
In message , cdel...@juno.com writes:
[long list of all the work to be done before the classical gas-cell Rb
improves materially]
You are sort of making my point here Corby.
It is not like people have not been improving the Rb-Gas-cell, but if
you want to improve it an order of
