Yes of course you are right. NTP timebase (based on UTC with an epoch
of 1900-01-01 00:00:00, or its representation in Unix time - seconds
since 1970-01-01 00:00:00) is timezone independent.
I just wanted to make the point that in the IT world (I've worked for
Amazon, Microsoft, Twitter and now I
NGFUL ANSWER."
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 9:01 AM Martin Burnicki
wrote:
>
> Fiorenzo Cattaneo wrote:
> > Yes of course you are right. NTP timebase (based on UTC with an epoch
> > of 1900-01-01 00:00:00, or its representation in Unix time - seconds
> > since 1970-01-01
ing before using any library which claims to
be leap-second compliant.
-- Fio Cattaneo
Universal AC, can Entropy be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:00 AM Peter Laws wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:01 AM Fior
? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:25 PM Fiorenzo Cattaneo wrote:
>
> I double check the Python code, and I can confirm it does not take
> LEAP seconds into account. I highly doubt you will find standard time
> libraries for the
I double check the Python code, and I can confirm it does not take
LEAP seconds into account. I highly doubt you will find standard time
libraries for the most common languages which will deal with LEAP
seconds. They would rather just ignore it and have one less of a
headache to worry about
Completely agree, this is great work. Very original thinking.
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts On Behalf Of Dave B via
time-nuts
Sent: Friday, 8 November, 2019 01:36
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 184, Issue 11
Nice work.
Well, yes and no. The speed of light is course always the same, but
in case of ethernet the latency is determined by the time it takes for the
packet to be transmitted at a given bitrate , plus switch delays, and output
/ input delays on the ethernet controller as well as the software
Hello everyone, this is the first time I actually make a modest n00b
contribution to time-nuts, so please be kind with me I will appreciate
any comments, criticism and suggestions.
Aside from GPSDO and Rubidium Oscillators, I am also quite interested in
radio clock receivers. So I found the
authority
for time, or at least one which is not easily spoofed or hacked.
-- Fio Cattaneo
Universal AC, can Entropy be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM Attila Kinali wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:24:57
Here are (some) answers to your questions. Using NTP to synchronize
time across all machines is the one which makes the most sense IMHO.
In the past I setup the NTP server architecture for a "megacorp" I was
working for, and I have replicated the same setup (at a much smaller
case) in my house.
Hi David, I don't particularly trust NTP servers from pool.ntp.org (I
assume that is what you mean by "pool"), and I use public stratum-1
servers chosen from a public list. Of course I make sure that my usage
complies with the policies and terms of use for each server (some
allow regional use
I have been quite puzzled about the asymmetric nature of my home Cable
Modem connection to the Internet in regard with the offset discrepancy
I observe. The "last mile" asymmetric nature of Cable Modem (Comcast
in my case) is not very high compared the delta I see between my
stratum-1 servers at
Any kind of atmospheric disturbance has a measurable effect on GPS
space and time precision, the question is more about how much the
impact is. Presuming that the GPS receiver is stationary, the antenna
has a clear visibility of the sky, then "ordinary weather" like
clouds, moderate rain or snow,
I also have a BG7TBL, version 2019-03-25, and I use it with a small
embedded X64_64 pcengines box with a dedicated mPCI RS232 receiver.
See picture attached, the PCENGINES box is the black box below the
GPSDO.
>
> 1. The GPS chip onboard can be set via RS232C, for instance by u-center
> program.
Hello David,
>>> I'm surprised you don't trust "pool" servers. My experience is that using
>>> the pool directive, and allowing NTP to expand its server list automatically
>>> to the maximum number of servers, gives good results usually with one of two
>>> servers at least being stratum-1
I'd definitely think so, good idea :-) . I've also seen some open
source projects which calibrate the PPM drift based on the measured
temperature either using the CPU's temperature measurement or a cheap
USB temperature ambient sensor, thus implementing some sort of
"software ovenization".
>
> > With this setup you have no single point of failure, and even if the
> > connection to internet fails, they can still provide time as they are
> > peering
> > and synchronizing with each other.
> No, it doesn't work that way. You need connectivity to at least one stratum 1
> server.
>
vanilla receiver?
Apologies for the many questions.
-- Fio Cattaneo
Universal AC, can Entropy be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:06 AM jimlux wrote:
>
> On 10/22/19 1:13 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> &g
be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> Fiorenzo Cattaneo writes:
> > I have been quite puzzled about the asymmetric nature of my home Cable
> > Modem connection to the Intern
The Garmin 18x I have still works, and I verified it works after a power
cycle. I'm running firmware version 4.40.
Apparently all the 4.XX firmware versions are related to GPS week rollover
fixes. Earlier versions also have fixes for "improved" time keeping. Here
is the download link for 18X:
Cattaneo
Universal AC, can Entropy be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 02:02, Adam Kumiszcza wrote:
>
>
> HI again!
>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:37 PM Fiorenzo Cattaneo wrote:
>> > 2. I wo
Yes you definitely need to disable and stop windows builtin ntp client.
-- Fio Cattaneo
Universal AC, can Entropy be reversed? -- "THERE IS AS YET
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 14:35, Chris Burford wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> You want to disable Windows Time
I remember when studying covert channel communication (as part of computer
security) that during the cold war one of the ways you could transmit very
low bit rate data (1 bit per minute or slower) was by modulating the power
consumption of an industrial plant, something that a spy would be easily
23 matches
Mail list logo