One way I like to put it is like you when I start it in ham radio I
immediately considered WWV as the answer to everything TimeWise.
But for me around about 1975 I worked at General Electric space flight
systems. One could say I became a Time nuts then and discovered that what I
thought what is a
Hi
The referenced line item is $6.8 million a year. It is still very much unclear
if that is just WWV(H)
(from the reference it must include them) or if it also includes WWWVB.
Without any clarification,
we are only guessing about WWVB. Given the way the budget process works,
there’s never a
Does any one know what the line item $$$ amount is for the WWV/WWVB
operating budget?
-DC
NR1DX
manu...@artekmanuals.com
On 9/1/2018 11:59 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 7:25 PM Bob kb8tq wrote:
I most certainly *have* seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed
the
Scott McGrath
I am an amateur radio operator (62 years), and I have accurate 1 PPS and 10 MHz
available. I also coordinate emergency communications for this very large
county.
I use WWV:
To judge propagation during normal and other than normal times
To set clocks after a power outage
Hi
I most certainly *have* seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed
the result to the internet. The fun part was that they had entered the “delay”
number into their config file with the wrong sign on it (or there was a bug in
the NTP code at that time). The result was that they were
Try receiving wwv or wwvb with your HP3586 SLV and determine precisely
where f(o) is.
It's difficult, ...as propagation and atmospheric conditions will
unwittingly prevail.
This ham prefers my gpsdo's, or my cesium.
Don
N5CID
=
On
Me too... that's why Lady Heather can calculate and plot solid earth tide
displacements. Also the vertical offset in gravity due to solar/lunar tidal
effects.
-
>I'd rather read about Earth tides affecting time measurements. ___
With respect, Scott, EVERY ham knows about WWV.
On Saturday, September 1, 2018, Scott McGrath wrote:
> I’m concerned with the science
>
> the WWV/WWVB stations provide invaluable information about the condition
> of the ionosphere with a baseline of DECADES of data.
>
> Also dont forget that
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:13 AM, David G. McGaw
wrote:
> I consider saving WWV/WWVH/WWVB to be ON topic. They may not be as
> precise as some on this list like to achieve, but they are publicly
> available methods of time dissemination. I am very concerned that factions
> of NIST consider that
I consider saving WWV/WWVH/WWVB to be ON topic. They may not be as
precise as some on this list like to achieve, but they are publicly
available methods of time dissemination. I am very concerned that
factions of NIST consider that this should no longer be part of their
mission.
David
Guys,
The noise level has risen rather high lately. I really think that
discussions of jamming of GPS and other systems are not relevant.
The loss of WWVx is also mostly OT as I don't believe that anyone seriously
still uses it for a time/frequency reference these days.
Dave
11 matches
Mail list logo
