If you are using the TICC to measure the time interval between two signals then
the reference clock does not need to be all that good (the gooder the better,
though).
But if you are using the TICC to measure one or two independent sources, then
your reference clock should be as good as you
Thank you! This is a great manual for time interval measurement. I'll go with
10811.
---
(Mr.) Taka Kamiya
I'm stuck in a wormhole Hello, worms!
On Friday, June 14, 2019, 12:28:26 AM EDT, Anders Wallin
wrote:
page 48 here has some notes on
page 48 here has some notes on time-base error:
http://leapsecond.com/hpan/an200-3.pdf
for time-interval measurement the number of digits matter. if you keep
time-intervals 'small', say 123.45 ns (probably can't resolve much below
10ps anyway with a TICC) then a time-base with only about 5-6
I am building a TICC-IN-A-BOX. Basically TICC + TADD-2 mini + reference
oscillator.
Initially, I was going to use HP11811-6011 but I am also considering PRS10. (I
already own both) While I believe 11811 is sufficient, PRS10 can be kept off
and reaches usable state (physics lock) faster,
