On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:18 AM, jimlux wrote:
> they're using Support Vector Machines and Machine Learning (how sexy! how
> fashionable!)
>
This approach has been done before, I wonder why it's not mentioned in
their literature survey.
The papers below have more details.
[1] Sirdey, R. &
Usenix paper:
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi18/nsdi18-geng.pdf
Usenix talk: https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi18/presentation/geng
At the end of the talk the presenter mentions WAN sync between labs at
Utah, Wisconsin and Clemson "under 10 microseconds"
I'd like to
On 7/2/18 10:42 AM, jimlux wrote:
https://news.slashdot.org/story/18/07/01/2022232/google-and-nasdaq-pursuing-nano-second-precision-in-network-time-protocol
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/29/technology/computer-networks-speed-nasdaq.html
100 ns... Doesn't seem particularly challenging if
https://news.slashdot.org/story/18/07/01/2022232/google-and-nasdaq-pursuing-nano-second-precision-in-network-time-protocol
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/29/technology/computer-networks-speed-nasdaq.html
100 ns... Doesn't seem particularly challenging if you have something
like PTP.
But
