[time-nuts] WWVB - Response to Question posed to John Lowe

2012-03-16 Thread Sam Reaves
I sent the following to John Lowe of the NIST regarding the WWVB change proposals. His comments follow. Dear Sir, I just read your whitepaper on the new modulation scheme proposed for WWVB. It seems that you and the other authors of this paper have addressed the concerns of people that use WWVB

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB - Response to Question posed to John Lowe

2012-03-16 Thread Peter Monta
So I gather from this they are working on something, but no details were given. One possibility for a workaround to keep the classical receivers happy is to leave some residual carrier. Instead of a 180-degree phase shift, make it 90 or 120, so that the signal can be regarded as the sum of a