Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-18 Thread Rex
Thomas A. Frank wrote: On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:08 AM, Peter Monta wrote: Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly within about a second. Well, apparently it is a phone issue and not a cell-tower issue. Searching the support forums yields the

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-18 Thread David Martindale
I have an iPod Touch. It's an iPhone without the cellular radio, the camera, the GPS, or the compass, but it runs most of the same applications. Emerald Time works fine on it. As far as I can tell, Apple refuses to acknowledge any timing precision finer than minutes in their user interface. It

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-18 Thread Armand Sperduti
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Message-ID: 4c429a8b.7040...@sonic.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Thomas A. Frank wrote: On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:08 AM, Peter Monta wrote

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-17 Thread Thomas A. Frank
FWIW, my iphone is presently 15 seconds slow wrt Emerald (which matches my GPS based clock as closely as my eye can judge). Tom Frank, KA2CDK On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Mark Gulbrandsen wrote: Now if only Apple would allow Emerald Time to correct the i- phone's internal clock we'd

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-17 Thread Thomas A. Frank
On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:08 AM, Peter Monta wrote: Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly within about a second. Well, apparently it is a phone issue and not a cell-tower issue. Searching the support forums yields the following trick: disable the

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Hal Murray
li...@ozindfw.net said: I used to work in the cell infra business. While it's less true today, there are still a number of operators that do not sync system clocks. The time supplied to users can be **minutes** off. Most newer operational standards can't tolerate this and accurate time

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Rex
I'm in San Jose. (Same Bay you are talking about?) I am on ATT but I have a Motoroloa Razr that's at least a couple years old. I just checked the phone's displayed time vs the internet and also my GPS receiver. I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly within about a second.

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Hal Murray
pmo...@gmail.com said: It would be amusing to arrange for a long-term record of the offset of one's phone (which can of course change across multiple providers during travel), say by using a background process to take a sample every few hours against NTP sources or against GPS if the phone

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Peter Monta
Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: I just eyeballed the minute turn-over but it was clearly within about a second. Well, apparently it is a phone issue and not a cell-tower issue. Searching the support forums yields the following trick: disable the automatic time setting, set it manually to a grossly

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Michael Conlen
In Tampa bay ATT is about 17 seconds off -- Mike On Jul 16, 2010, at 1:00, Peter Monta pmo...@gmail.com wrote: Oz-in-DFW writes: ... There is no way ATT would be 12.4 seconds off ... I used to work in the cell infra business. While it's less true today, there are still a number of

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 7/16/2010 1:57 AM, Hal Murray wrote: li...@ozindfw.net said: Most newer operational standards can't tolerate this and accurate time (better than a ms) is important. WiMAX requires TDD base stations to base station alignment to be better than 1 microsecond. Most telecom operators

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 7/16/2010 12:00 AM, Peter Monta wrote: Here in the Bay Area, ATT/iPhone time has gotten noticeably worse recently. The error used to be around 4 seconds; now it's 49 seconds (!). Emerald Time is fine for interactive use, but what I find very impolite is that ATT's bad timestamps are

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-16 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Here in Carlisle PA the same check shows the iPhone 3G within a second. That's running 3G, with no odd settings on the phone. Bob On Jul 16, 2010, at 3:06 AM, Rex wrote: I'm in San Jose. (Same Bay you are talking about?) I am on ATT but I have a Motoroloa Razr that's at least a couple

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-15 Thread Steve Rooke
On 15/07/2010, Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just found a handy free iPhone app called Emerald Time. It uses ntp and visually shows the time to within 100 msec. I've videod the screen and compared it with a real clock and found the claim to be accurate. You know you can be

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-15 Thread Mark Gulbrandsen
 Now if only Apple would allow Emerald Time to correct the i-phone's internal clock we'd actually have something. By using Emerald Time my i-phone's internal clock has shown itself to be off by as much as 12.4 seconds. That no longer qualifies as a usable clock to me. If I am out somewhere and

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-15 Thread paul swed
Hate to say it. ATT is wrong and so are the rest of us. Its Apple time on Apple stuff thats the standard. You can have your own reference when you control a particular world. On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Bob Bownes bow...@gmail.com wrote: I put ntp on mine. :) On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at

Re: [time-nuts] Handy iPhone app

2010-07-15 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 7/15/2010 9:40 AM, Mark Gulbrandsen wrote: ... There is no way ATT would be 12.4 seconds off ... I used to work in the cell infra business. While it's less true today, there are still a number of operators that do not sync system clocks. The time supplied to users can be **minutes**