Hello Dave,
being 'time-nuts', it is of course to know the time of day to the
nanosecond!
That said, I truly believe there are only two wristwatches out there for
the serious time-nutter:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/846511652/the-worlds-first-true-atomic-wristwatch-the-cesium/updates
Dana, the magnetic impulse of a quartz watch stepping the second hand forward
is easily picked up by an unshielded coil. Wind a couple hundred turns of
magnet wire around a bottle cap and hold near the watch face. Plug into the
microphone input of a PC and run audacity to record the waveform.
Hi
The most common way to pull the 32KHz signal off of a watch is via a tuned
microphone. At least that’s the way we did it in production. A watch crystal
*can* (but usually doesn’t) move > 100 PPM with temperature. When things
are set up, assumptions are made about “your” temperature
Most of the quartz watches I've owned were off by about 1-2 minutes per
month,
which I consider inexcusable.
Agreed, the mechanical trimmer is rather problematical, but I'd sure like
to see
*something *that the sophisticated user can tweak at home. Measurement of
the
current rate error is
Hi
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 1:33 AM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
>
> I concur with Bill. And even if one keeps tabs on the current watch error,
> as is the usual practice by celestial navigators, once that error reaches
> or exceeds more than a minute the process frankly gets more
om>
> Date :14/03/2018 22:40 (GMT+01:00)
> A : Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Need a Watch Recommendation
>
> Nice but lacks "day” feature (has “date”). I don’t normally care whether
> it’s th
I concur with Bill. And even if one keeps tabs on the current watch error,
as is the usual practice by celestial navigators, once that error reaches
or exceeds more than a minute the process frankly gets more clumsy and
error prone. And if a watch drifts in time very rapidly, one loses faith
in
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018, at 6:53 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> What is the most demanding task one would use a wrist watch for?
It depends on your job or hobby.
During the Apollo 13 rocket burn before their emergency re-entry, Jack
Swigert used a wrist watch to time the retrorocket burn which was
ssion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com>
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Need a Watch Recommendation
Nice but lacks "day” feature (has “date”). I don’t normally care whether
it’s the 22nd or the 23rd but it’s nice to know whether it’s Tuesday or
Wednesday. YMMV, of c
On 5 March 2018 at 16:50, William H. Fite wrote:
> And that is just my point--well, part of it, anyway--ultra-precise
> measurement of time is profoundly important, and rightly the primary focus
> of this group. But for the wrist, very, very few of us need pin-point
>
Nice but lacks "day” feature (has “date”). I don’t normally care whether
it’s the 22nd or the 23rd but it’s nice to know whether it’s Tuesday or
Wednesday. YMMV, of course.
Jeremy
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM Achim Vollhardt
wrote:
> Dear Don and all,
> no mentioning
Dear Don and all,
no mentioning of the Seiko Astron GPS Solar?
http://www.seiko-astron.com/
73s
Achim DH2VA
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
On 3/5/2018 7:38 AM, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
> So, Time Nuts... any suggestions or recommendations?
For non-formal, day-to-day wear, I've been partial to Casio G-Shock
watches for a long time. They're rugged, reliable, and have the basic
features one might want: stopwatch, countdown
Don,
I am very pleased with the performance of my CITIZEN Eco-Drive SKYHAWK. It can
receive WWVB (USA), JJY (Japan), or DCF77 (Germany). I am convinced it is
accurate to within 1 second at all times. It is a 'Blue Angels' watch, part of
the NaviHawk series I think.
behalf of Nick Sayer via
time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 10:13 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Need a Watch Recommendation
Lots of folks have chimed in on this thread, but I will just add that the Apple
wat
Lots of folks have chimed in on this thread, but I will just add that the Apple
watch is an NTP client. I’m extremely happy with mine, but the reasons I am are
far, far wider than its accuracy (which I can only judge by eye, which is an
extraordinary low bar for a Time Nut).
> On Mar 4, 2018,
And that is just my point--well, part of it, anyway--ultra-precise
measurement of time is profoundly important, and rightly the primary focus
of this group. But for the wrist, very, very few of us need pin-point
accuracy--though many seem to perceive that we do. My Tissot mechanical
chronograph is
Eurochron (I believe they're low-end brand of Junghams) make a plastic
DCF77 watch. 'Plastic' doesn't do it justice - although the one I had
eventually wore away, it was attractive and well made and lasted for
several years.
I think this is the WWVB equivalent.
I really don't want a conductive metal-case watch on my arm. What I do
want is a light-weight, thin watch with day, date and analog display
with sweep second hand. Not digital... Ok, that may be old-fashioned but
it suits me. I've never found a suitable wwvb watch.
So, I opt for an
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 07:45:51 -0800
Jerry Hancock wrote:
> An by the way, I also have a Tissot P-touch as a retirement gift from IBM.
> Got the watch, as they say. I can say it is very accurate for a non-
> disciplined watch if you wear it every day.
Even if you do not wear
An by the way, I also have a Tissot P-touch as a retirement gift from IBM. Got
the watch, as they say. I can say it is very accurate for a non-disciplined
watch if you wear it every day.
Regards,
Jerry
Jerry Hancock
je...@hanler.com
(415) 215-3779
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:44 AM, Attila
If you are into rugged, I have a casio atomic solar that special forces use…
I was able to tail-end a gov’t contract and got it for cheap.
aren’t we silly.
Regards,
Jerry
Jerry Hancock
je...@hanler.com
(415) 215-3779
> On Mar 4, 2018, at 10:38 PM, Don Murray via time-nuts
For those of us whose time-nuttery extends into the fascinating world of
mechanical watches and clocks, the kind of accuracy usually discussed here
is not only impossible but essentially irrelevant (quelle horreur!). Our
interest is in the beauty and elegance of micromechanical devices that have
Am 05.03.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Bob kb8tq:
If you want to stick with WWV, the Citizen “Ecco Drive” (solar) WWVB
ECO-Drive
watches are a pretty good option. Until I caved in to the wonders of
a cell phone on my wrist, I used them for many years. Nothing to fuss
with. No battery to die on you.
Hi
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 1:38 AM, Don Murray via time-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Hello Time Nuts...
>
>
>
> After 6 years of no troubles, in sync with WWV any
> hour of the day, flawless transfer between
> standard and daylight time my Stauer Titanium
> Atomic wristwatch bite
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 01:38:06 -0500
Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
> So it looks as if I am in need of a new wristwatch,
> which will give me some kind of time accuracy.
I've owned several Swatch and Tissot over the past decades,
Growing up in Switzerland does that to you.
Even my pre civil war pocket watches should be good enough
for your needs. Better than a minute/day.
But for some (many) time-nuts it's about wants, not needs.
My clocks and watches that can be heard across the room qualify
me as old school time nut. (My DOB qualifies me as just plain old.)
I wore a Casio "Atomic" watch and it set itself reliably for many years
until very recently. They are still available. I've replaced it with a
Seiko Solar "Radio" watch which I understand has a better wwvb receiver
in it. Haven't worn it yet so I'm not sure how it will perform but I've
heard
Hi Bill...
My Rolex GMT Master was stolen back in '75,
so no luck on that. Rolex is a bit pricey for
my needs.
My Seiko CQ001M, one of the first Seiko Digitals,
was amazing. Over the time I had it, it varied less
than plus/minus 1 second against WWV. I carried
a Radio Shack Time Kube with
My 37 year old Rolex day-date gains less than 2 sec/day compared to GPS clock.
Rolex standard is +6/-2 sec/day.
Regards, NL7F
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 01:38:06 -0500, Don Murray via time-nuts wrote:
>Hello Time Nuts...
>-
>After 6 years of no troubles, in sync with WWV any
>hour of the day,
30 matches
Mail list logo