Re: [time-nuts] WWVB phase modulation format?

2012-03-11 Thread Peter Monta
> ... or I suppose we could ask. I did ask, using the contact email on the NIST page (John Lowe). I'll forward any replies to the list. Perhaps we could encourage a more ambitious DCF77-like scheme, if that's really not in the current plans for WWVB. Especially given the recent demise of Loran-

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB phase modulation format?

2012-03-11 Thread Peter Monta
> I believe what they were doing is applying a simple 180 deg phase shift to > the carrier (BPSK) during certain one second timecode intervals. I suppose this will help coherent receivers somewhat, but I was expecting something DCF77-like. A pity. Thanks for posting your data. You certainly ha

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB phase modulation format?

2012-03-11 Thread John Seamons
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:53 PM, John Seamons wrote: > I took a look at this. Pictures and video here: http://jks.com > > I believe what they were doing is applying a simple 180 deg phase shift to > the carrier (BPSK) during certain one second timecode intervals. > Whether there was anything fancie

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB phase modulation format?

2012-03-11 Thread John Seamons
On Mar 9, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Peter Monta wrote: > Interesting that WWVB is running a phase-modulation test---thanks for > the links. Is the signal format known? A quick search shows nothing > specific, just "we're testing". > > Could someone record a few minutes of the broadband signal so that >