> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] include more options in configure to be
> able to build tinycc with debian
> Message-ID: <201205252045.44099.robo...@celest.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Le vendredi 25 mai 2012 19:59:59, Pedro A ARANDA a ?crit :
> > I needed to force con
Hi,
On Sun, 27 May 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
If one changes anything at all then it only makes sense to change it so
as to be layout compatible with GCC. A third layout (GCC, TCC-old,
TCC-new) wouldn't help. Although the rules of GCC are relatively
obscure and complex in corner cases.
Act
Alright. Sounds good. I'm in. :-)
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
Original Message
From: Michael Matz
Sent: Sun, May 27, 2012 04:49 PM
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
CC:
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] question about bit-fields
>Hi,
>
>On Sun, 27 May 2012, Rick Hodgin wrote:
>
>>
Hi,
On Sun, 27 May 2012, Rick Hodgin wrote:
Didier,
You're able to take the code and modify that requirement. It seems
straight-forward enough that TinyCC is (in memory at compile-time)
determining the target size, regardless of the storage size, and using
that for the storage size in memo
Didier,
You're able to take the code and modify that requirement. It seems
straight-forward enough that TinyCC is (in memory at compile-time) determining
the target size, regardless of the storage size, and using that for the storage
size in memory. You could alter that code to always use the
> > Is there an option or a declaration to make tcc compute the expected
> > length for unsigned-int-based bit fields?
>
> No, there isn't.
>
> AFAIK the C standard says this is implementation-defined.
> For portability don't use bitfields.
Thank for your answer. I see the problem. I added a ch
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:39AM +0200, Didier Barvaux wrote:
> Is there an option or a declaration to make tcc compute the expected
> length for unsigned-int-based bit fields?
No, there isn't.
AFAIK the C standard says this is implementation-defined.
For portability don't use bitfields.
Dan
Hello all,
I'm trying to build my project with tcc (yesterday's git version). It
succeeds without any required change (cool!), but tests fail :(
I narrowed the problem to bit-fields, and more especially to the length
of some bit-fields. I created a small test program to explain the
problem:
$ ca