Sergey Korshunoff wrote: ---
The recommendation is:
Implementations should avoid imposing fixed translation limits
whenever possible.
Implemented adddition is a macro recursion detection:
* on define macro stage (is the name of macro can be found in macro string)
Bad idea :
#define A
> The recommendation is:
> Implementations should avoid imposing fixed translation limits
> whenever possible.
Implemented adddition is a macro recursion detection:
* on define macro stage (is the name of macro can be found in macro string)
* on macro call stage (is the name of macro can be
On 2016-04-29 00:50:59 +, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Don't you think it might it be a good idea to limit the possible
> level of recursion?
It seems that the standard doesn't provide a minimum limit for macro
recursion. But it general, this is 63 nesting levels of [...].
> I don't have time
Don't you think it might it be a good idea to limit the possible level of
recursion?
I don't have time to look at the C99 standard right now, but I'd be surprised
if there weren't a recommendation on this.
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel
Hi!
A problem solved. A patch
https://github.com/seyko2/tinycc/commit/152d0fb3275169c8f4eca97f4f90ec85f437ae4c
https://github.com/seyko2/tinycc/commit/bc60d942e52f7e8cb9392dd0e6e6a79b42fcd054
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
