Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.27

Grischka, First, be sure I don't want to bother you for free. I KNOW for years how to build and test Windows tcc (both 32/64) from Cygwin32 and Cygwin64 (it was called win32/Makefile). It allowed anybody to easily test mod changes on Windows. My ONLY goal is to let other people to do the same.

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Include path bug (Was: Re: plans to 0.9.27)

grischka wrote: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: .. |> mildly. I guess the right thing to do would be to strip all paths |> which are also in the system array from the user paths present in |> the non-standardized $C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variable, even if |> that means that

Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.27

Christian Jullien wrote: But worse, I've also the impression that, after building W/tcc, make test still uses Cygwin version. Can you please check and tell me if I'm wrong or the way I can run "make test" using W/tcc? Some tests use the build CC (which normally is gcc) to create the reference

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Include path bug (Was: Re: plans to 0.9.27)

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: Hello. So i thought about it and come back to apologize. At least mildly. I guess the right thing to do would be to strip all paths which are also in the system array from the user paths present in the non-standardized $C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variable, even if that

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Include path bug (Was: Re: plans to 0.9.27)

Hello. So i thought about it and come back to apologize. At least mildly. I guess the right thing to do would be to strip all paths which are also in the system array from the user paths present in the non-standardized $C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variable, even if that means that this possibly