Re: [Tinycc-devel] test 104 fails on windows: missing mkstemps

2019-06-17 Thread avih
Wouldn't it be better to just create a known/fixed file instead? (assuming the test doesn't need explicitly mkstemps, I didn't look at its actual code). On Monday, June 17, 2019 11:50 PM, Christian Jullien wrote: #yiv8167816049 #yiv8167816049 -- _filtered #yiv8167816049

Re: [Tinycc-devel] test 104 fails on windows: missing mkstemps

2019-06-17 Thread Christian Jullien
Yes it has been previously reported. Michael, as said in a private mail, I agree with you that this test should be skipped on Windows. C. From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of avih Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 22:46 To: Tinycc-devel