Can you test attached patch.
There might be more places that use __APPLE__ that should be done
differently.
You can commit if it works because I cannot test it.
Herman
On 2020-09-19 06:48, Christian Jullien wrote:
Hi I generally test tcc Linux x64 on Fedora 32, giving a try on an up
to
Hi I generally test tcc Linux x64 on Fedora 32, giving a try on an up to
date Debian v10.5, while it works with gcc, using clang, I get:
jullien@debian64:~/tinycc$ uname -a
Linux debian64 4.19.0-10-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.132-1 (2020-07-24) x86_64
GNU/Linux
jullien@debian64:~/tinycc$
On 2020-09-04 23:07, Petr Skocik wrote:
Hi.
I don't know if this is known, but tinycc seems to have some issues
zero-initializing bitfields.
I just committed a patch to mob to fix this.
Herman
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
On 2020-09-17 22:28, grischka wrote:
Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel wrote:
+#if 0 /* does not work with fork */
ptr = mmap (NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
prx = mmap (NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+#else
+ ptr = prx = mmap (NULL,
