On May 21, 2015 9:58:07 AM GMT+08:00, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Michael,
I knew you'd know :-)
>
> No, the missing of .got.plt is a red herring (it's used to implement a
>
> security feature to isolate .got slots that can be written to also
> after
> program relocation from those can
Hi,
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
On May 18, 2015 11:17:35 PM GMT+08:00, Sergey Korshunoff
wrote:
tries comparing the output of readelf -a for an hello world program
but there are too many
differences and I didn't spot anything obvious
there is no .got.plt section in the
On May 18, 2015 11:17:35 PM GMT+08:00, Sergey Korshunoff
wrote:
> > tries comparing the output of readelf -a for an hello world program
> but there are too many
> > differences and I didn't spot anything obvious
>
> there is no .got.plt section in the tcc generated exe. gcc don't
> generate this
> tries comparing the output of readelf -a for an hello world program but there
> are too many
> differences and I didn't spot anything obvious
there is no .got.plt section in the tcc generated exe. gcc don't
generate this section if bind_now. no (FLAGS attribute too.
___
On May 18, 2015 7:46:26 PM GMT+08:00, Thomas Preud'homme
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently working on distention, cleaning up and refactoring
Err, documentation.
> tccelf.c. The process already uncovered some bugs and one of them is
> that PLT0 is broken for ARM [1]. Since binaries are workin
Hi all,
I'm currently working on distention, cleaning up and refactoring tccelf.c. The
process already uncovered some bugs and one of them is that PLT0 is broken for
ARM [1]. Since binaries are working, I investigated and found that the lazy
relocation of PLTGOT entries is not in effect. When _
