ink I am better off loading on a 32 bit computer?
If you would like the errors I can post but they seem to be integer
related such as make check failing with errors about type long etc..
Thanks for reading-Patrick
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-d
Hi Everyone
I tried TCC a few years ago. If I remember correctly I used something
like CC=tcc in my bashrc.
I wasn't able to compile anything but toy programs with it and I moved on.
Last night I tried again but this time I did not alter my bashrc but
instead used ./configure disable-shared
On 18-03-12 09:27 AM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Last night I tried again but this time I did not alter my bashrc but
instead used ./configure disable-shared CC=tcc
I guess TCC can't generate position independent code. I am having a lot
more luck now and I had a great time
On 18-03-12 09:39 AM, Patrick wrote:
On 18-03-12 09:27 AM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Last night I tried again but this time I did not alter my bashrc but
instead used ./configure disable-shared CC=tcc
I guess TCC can't generate position independent code. I am having a lot
:\TCC\INCLUDE
I am getting two errors:
library libtcc-32.a not found
and
undefined symbol _start
Could you tell me what I am doing wrong?
Thanks for reading-Patrick
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
Hi Everyone
Sorry for answering my own post. I just want to mention that I retried
everything with the 64 bit package on Windows 7 and everything is fine.
If you happen to know how to get this to work on Windows 98, that would
be nice as it's much lighter weight and easier to run in Qemu.
I
to
help right?
"--config-uClibc,-musl,-mingw32... enable system specific configurations"
Thanks for reading-Patrick
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Thanks Michael !
You have another tinycc-disciple now. If I find arm bugs, I will try to
study and fix them myself. I will also report back with successes and
failures. I work very slowly but I will be back-Patrick
On 2019-03-12 01:14 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019
run the testsuite)
Downside: Increases compile time (up to ... almost 5 seconds! ;) ), adds more
complexity to the Makefiles, ...
Maybe it would be useful as a Makefile target?
> Ok, using gcc -O3 you can generate a tcc that compiles faster any program
ead of the expected output:
1
0
tested with tcc 536ed76d5a69d8e3c0e247d6557f5942818cb253
--
Regards,
Patrick Pélissier
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
, which is
not was expected too.
I wasn't able to reduce the test case any further.
--
Regards,
Patrick Pélissier
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
}
when compiled with TCC GIT c41caac02d53373b296ccb179b730ada62137cc0
produces the result on an linux/x86-64 platform:
N=9223372036854775810
whereas I was expecting
N=2
--
Regards,
Patrick Pélissier
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongn
gram which doesn't compile in an extra
thread.
Best regards,
Patrick
arraystring.c
Description: Binary data
arraystring_workaround.c
Description: Binary data
arraystring_workaround2.c
Description: Binary data
arraystring_workaround3.c
Description: Binary data
__
in my program
though.
In this case it might be an issue with the preprocessor and not the parser.
Best regards,
Patrick
stringify.c
Description: Binary data
stringify_workaround.c
Description: Binary data
stringify_workaround2.c
Description: Binary
ushed with a wrong email address, and this demands a
rebase&amend, which changes all commit hashes beginning from the edited
commit.
Best regards,
Patrick
Am Fr., 11. Sept. 2020 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb Pursuer <1596067...@qq.com>:
> I found a way to remove these empty commit, by use "
81a32ec305ee871d8129978bf3d57bc108bec46b)
The program is a little bit long so it is available here:
https://gist.github.com/P-p-H-d/aeb690c7ed396b57a84f9a5fc83e10c0
--
Regards
Patrick
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
Thanks for the patch.
I am not competent to know if it is correct but at least It fixes my issue.
--
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 8:43 AM Herman ten Brugge
wrote:
>
> On 12/8/23 20:47, Patrick Pelissier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I ha
" type since it uses
the comma operator.
--
Regards,
Patrick
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 8:52 AM Herman ten Brugge
wrote:
> I cannot find a lot of information on this feature.
> Is it a gcc/clang extension?
> Does it only apply to typeof?
I think it is §6.3.2.1.3 of C11.
--
Regards,
Patrick
___
Tin
Hello list,
I just tried making GNU Parted compatible with tcc and have finally
succeeded, though only with a wrapper script and some modifications.
Maybe you are interested in what I've found.
1) 64 bit issue:
struct A
{
uint64_t field:N;
}
does not work because tcc thinks uint64_t is
20 matches
Mail list logo
