Dear Sir,
Please find the file at the following link. The file contains PRR vs.
LPL_wakeup_interval observations. Please skim through the details provided
below each of the tables in the file.
http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~doddaven/lpl.pdf
Sincerely,
Manjunath D
I don't think this quite answers my question: it was whether, on using
setLocalWakeupInterval(), you see a change in PRR on simple AM transmissions.
I.e., is this a general link layer issue, or an interaction between the link
layer and CTP? My guess is that it is the former, but evidence would h
Dear Sir,
The problem and its cause can be summarized as follows.
In the case of CTP, I guess it is required to set LPL variables (local
and remote sleep intervals) from the Makefile. Otherwise, I guess no
preamble is sent before transmitting routing beacons thus resulting in
unexpected
On Nov 7, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Manjunath Doddavenkatappa wrote:
>
> Dear Dr. Gnawali,
>
> Sorry to get back to you so late, we had a paper deadline.
>
> Everything works fine if I set LPL variables from the Makefile as in
> TestNetworkLpl. Problems arise only on trying to set LPL variables from
Dear Dr. Gnawali,
Sorry to get back to you so late, we had a paper deadline.
Everything works fine if I set LPL variables from the Makefile as in
TestNetworkLpl. Problems arise only on trying to set LPL variables from
the program using "setLocalWakeupInterval()". Just to verify in the later
Are you using TestNetworkLpl and changing the flags in the Makefile to
control various intervals? If not, you should tell me how to replicate
your problem starting with TestNetworkLpl.
- om_p
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Manjunath Doddavenkatappa
wrote:
>
> Generally, yes. As ETX increases
Generally, yes. As ETX increases lossses also increase. I can observe the
fact that
RetxmitTimer in CtpForwardingEngine being fired quite a few times before sucessfully transmitting every packet.
But, only a few times this does not hold with packets getting through
although ETX remains at a
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Manjunath Doddavenkatappa
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> We are not able to figure out a reason why ETX values in CTP increases as
> wake-up interval of the LPL (BoXMaC-One) increases. We have a simple setup
> of a sender and a root node placed adjacent to each other.
Dear All,
We are not able to figure out a reason why ETX values in CTP increases as
wake-up interval of the LPL (BoXMaC-One) increases. We have a simple setup
of a sender and a root node placed adjacent to each other. Nodes use
maximum power of 0 dBm.
1) We are using IPI of 15s. We repe
