On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Omprakash Gnawali wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:52 AM, wasif masood rwmas...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I think it would be troublesome if one neighbor completely vanishes
from the vicinity of a node because in that case node will always be
transmitting 3 byte
Yes, I think it would be troublesome if one neighbor completely vanishes
from the vicinity of a node because in that case node will always be
transmitting 3 byte additional overhead in terms of the reverse link
neighbour quality.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Omprakash Gnawali
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:52 AM, wasif masood rwmas...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I think it would be troublesome if one neighbor completely vanishes
from the vicinity of a node because in that case node will always be
transmitting 3 byte additional overhead in terms of the reverse link
neighbour
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:16 AM, wasif masood rwmas...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering how CTP evicts a complelety dead neighbor? because the normal
procedure is this:
1-
if (curr_seq - pre_seq 10)
remove the neighbor
if(nieghbortable full)
remove the most loss neighbor
now what
I am wondering how CTP evicts a complelety dead neighbor? because the normal
procedure is this:
1-
if (curr_seq - pre_seq 10)
remove the neighbor
if(nieghbortable full)
remove the most loss neighbor
now what will happen, if there is still some space in NeighborTable and its
not possible to
