Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-19 Thread Omprakash Gnawali
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Roger Larsson roger.lars...@ltu.se wrote: Asking on a TinyOS list, what response do you expect to get? :-) I am currently examining options to TinyOS. Yesterday was my first day really evaluating Contiki. This is my first impressions. Community - TinyOS

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-16 Thread Roger Larsson
...@millennium.berkeley.edu [tinyos-help-boun...@millennium.berkeley.edu] f#246;r Pablo Marcos Oltra [pablo.marcos.ol...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 15 november 2010 17:58 Till: Wahid; tinyos-help Ämne: Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki Hi Wahid, I ended up using TinyOS because of the documentation

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Pablo Marcos Oltra
Hi Wahid, I ended up using TinyOS because of the documentation and the community. I found that Contiki's documentation was awful compared with TinyOS's one. Furthermore, everyone that I know is using TinyOS, and for what I needed to do (implementing and changing the 802.15.4 standard) it was

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Jose Araujo
Hi, There is a course going on at KTH, sweden on Sensor Networks given by Adam Dunkels, Luca Mottola and Olaf Landsiedel, with some good info on the OSs for WSNs. In my opinion, if you plan to do hardware implementations with the motes use TinyOS since the documentation for TinyOS is much

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Philip Levis
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jose Araujo wrote: Hi, There is a course going on at KTH, sweden on Sensor Networks given by Adam Dunkels, Luca Mottola and Olaf Landsiedel, with some good info on the OSs for WSNs. In my opinion, if you plan to do hardware implementations with the motes

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Jose Araujo
Hi, The Cooja with TinyOS is not yet 100% bug free but maybe it works 100% well for some things. Worth a try! Jose On 2010/11/15, at 19:50, Philip Levis wrote: On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jose Araujo wrote: Hi, There is a course going on at KTH, sweden on Sensor Networks given by

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Olaf Landsiedel
Cc: tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Jose Araujo wrote: Hi, There is a course going on at KTH, sweden on Sensor Networks given by Adam Dunkels, Luca Mottola and Olaf Landsiedel, with some good info

Re: [Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-11-15 Thread Jose Araujo
Hi, There is a course going on at KTH, sweden on Sensor Networks given by Adam Dunkels, Luca Mottola and Olaf Landsiedel, with some good info on the OSs for WSNs. In my opinion, if you plan to do hardware implementations with the motes use TinyOS since the documentation for TinyOS is much

[Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-10-06 Thread Pablo Marcos Oltra
Hi all, I know this is such a hard topic, but I'd like that you gave me your honest and objective opinion about what SO should I use. I know it probably depends on what I need to do, so I'm going to tell you about that. I have to implement something about the standard 802.15.4-2006, and I've been

[Tinyos-help] TinyOS vs Contiki

2010-10-06 Thread Pablo Marcos Oltra
Hi all, I know this is such a hard topic, but I'd like that you gave me your honest and objective opinion about what SO should I use. I know it probably depends on what I need to do, so I'm going to tell you about that. I have to implement something about the standard 802.15.4-2006, and I've been