You might want to see the thread with this subject "erroneous data in
received packets" for discussion on a related topic.
- om_p
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Xiaohui Liu wrote:
> Are the packet corruption caused by fase positive of CRC? Essentially I'm
> just trying to see if these corrupte
Are the packet corruption caused by fase positive of CRC? Essentially I'm
just trying to see if these corrupted packets are due to the inherent limit
of the radio stack or some bug in my code.
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Xiaohui Liu wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> So you
Thanks for your reply.
So you mean received packet payload can be different from its payload at the
sender side? If so, what's the probability for this case to happen,
approximately? Does this apply to UART stack as well besides radio stack?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Omprakash Gnawali
wrot
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Xiaohui Liu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> A packet is sent with AMSenderC[AM_TYPE].Send.send and it has a payload of,
> say, 0xFF. After the packet is received by
> AMReceiverC[AM_TYPE].Receive.receive, sometimes I find it has a different
> payload (i.e., not 0xFF). But
Hi everyone,
A packet is sent with *AMSenderC[AM_TYPE].Send.send* and it has a payload
of, say, 0xFF. After the packet is received by *
AMReceiverC[AM_TYPE].Receive.receive*, sometimes I find it has a different
payload (i.e., not 0xFF). But the probability for this to happen is low,
around 1 out o
