RE: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz

2006-09-22 Thread Munaretto, Daniel
Thanks very much for your explanation. So you confirm the version of Xbow, that CSMA-CA is in micaz by default. BTW, during my tests, it seems true that there is a conflict between flash and radio on micaz. In fact now they survive after the reading-from-flash phase and they last for several

RE: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz

2006-09-22 Thread David Moss
-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU Subject: RE: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz Thanks very much for your explanation. So you confirm the version of Xbow, that CSMA-CA is in micaz by default. BTW, during my tests, it seems true that there is a conflict between flash and radio on micaz. In fact

Re: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz

2006-09-22 Thread Philip Levis
On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:56 AM, David Moss wrote: You're right, it's very concerning that TinyOS 1.x is as unstable as it is on mica- hardware. Your battery observation is exactly what is reflected on the datasheet though - 1.3V batteries in series = 2.6V, which is less than the 2.7V

RE: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz

2006-09-22 Thread David Moss
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 8:27 AM To: David Moss Cc: 'Munaretto, Daniel'; tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:56 AM, David Moss wrote: You're right, it's very concerning that TinyOS 1.x

Re: [Tinyos-help] conflict flash-radio,micaz

2006-09-22 Thread Philip Levis
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:37 AM, David Moss wrote: Hah... you're right Phil as well, Phil, the battery voltage plays a huge part here. But I have also seen the micaz mote crash while testing file transfers from mote to mote, with both motes plugged into MIB520 boards. The file transfer worked