Yet another duplicate of syzbot+a25307ad099309f1c...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
A fix has been posted.
///jon
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> On Behalf Of syzbot
> Sent: 23-Mar-19 19:03
> To: da...@davemloft.net; Jon Maloy ;
> kuz...@ms2.inr.ac.ru;
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> On Behalf Of Wei Yongjun
> Sent: 25-Mar-19 07:31
> To: Jon Maloy ; Ying Xue
> ; Hoang Huu Le ;
> Eric Dumazet
> Cc: Wei Yongjun ; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net;
Just another manifestation of
syzbot+a25307ad099309f1c...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
We have just posted a patch fixing this.
///jon
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> On Behalf Of syzbot
> Sent: 24-Mar-19 14:38
> To:
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
> -Original Message-
> From: Xin Long
> Sent: 23-Mar-19 17:48
> To: network dev
> Cc: da...@davemloft.net; Jon Maloy ; Ying Xue
> ; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net;
> syzkal...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [PATCH net] tipc: change to check tipc_own_id to return
Hi Ying!
Correct, the idea was inspired from SACK in SCTP protocol but with simplicity.
Also, I see your suggestions about the "duplicated packets"... which is
connected to the SCTP "delayed SACK" algorithm (i.e. in the case of no payload
message loss). In TIPC, as I understand so far, we
