__tipc_sendmsg() is called to send SYN packet by either tipc_sendmsg()
or tipc_connect(). The difference is in tipc_connect(), it will call
tipc_wait_for_connect() after __tipc_sendmsg() to wait until connecting
is done. So there's no need to wait in __tipc_sendmsg() for this case.

This patch is to fix it by calling tipc_wait_for_connect() only when dlen
is not 0 in __tipc_sendmsg(), which means it's called by tipc_connect().

Note this also fixes the failure in tipcutils/test/ptts/:

  # ./tipcTS &
  # ./tipcTC 9
  (hang)

Fixes: 36239dab6da7 ("tipc: fix implicit-connect for SYN+")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <shu...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
---
 net/tipc/socket.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
index 75b99b7eda22..8754bd885169 100644
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int __tipc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct 
msghdr *m, size_t dlen)
 
        if (unlikely(syn && !rc)) {
                tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_CONNECTING);
-               if (timeout) {
+               if (dlen && timeout) {
                        timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
                        tipc_wait_for_connect(sock, &timeout);
                }
-- 
2.27.0



_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to