Re: [tipc-discussion] kernel page allocation problem

2016-04-10 Thread Erik Hugne
On Apr 10, 2016 15:27, "Leon Pollak" wrote: > > After your answer I again looked through the both manuals and did not find > anything saying that connectionless messaging allows drops. Vice verse, the > programmer's manual explicitly states that "TIPC is designed to be a reliable

Re: [tipc-discussion] kernel page allocation problem

2016-04-10 Thread Leon Pollak
On Friday 01 April 2016 15:02:05 Jon Maloy wrote: > > I saw that the problem is in the lack of memory. > > I also made a simple stress test (one side sends in a loop) and received > > this problem immediately. > > But User's Manual states that if there is no room for the receiving side > > to

Re: [tipc-discussion] kernel page allocation problem

2016-03-30 Thread Leon Pollak
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 14:40:58 Jon Maloy wrote: > Hi Leon, > I took a quick look at your dump, and to me it looks like you have simply run out of memory. I think that is the first thing you should look at. > As for the most recent code version to use, I cannot give you aby definite answer,

Re: [tipc-discussion] kernel page allocation problem

2016-03-29 Thread Jon Maloy
. > -Original Message- > From: Leon Pollak [mailto:le...@plris.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2016 07:18 > To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [tipc-discussion] kernel page allocation problem > > Hello, gurus. > > Recently I encountered the ker