Re: [tipc-discussion] Disabled port detection

2020-01-15 Thread Jay Pelletier
Jon,

Ok, thank you for the response.

Jay

From: Jon Maloy 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 6:50 PM
To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net 
; Jay Pelletier 

Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] Disabled port detection

Hi Jay,
Unfortunately there is no such feature in TIPC. TIPC on node A will detect that 
the connectivity to all other nodes is lost, and vice versa, but there is no 
way they can tell *why* this happened.

///Jon


On Monday, January 13, 2020, 12:48:47 PM GMT-5, Jay Pelletier 
 wrote:


Hello all,

I have a bit of a general question.  Is TIPC able to detect when a port on a 
network switch is disabled?

To further illustrate, here is the scenario:

A 3 node cluster where each node is connected to one another via a network 
switch.  When the port for the connection of one of the nodes (lets call it 
Node A) is disabled (not disconnected), Node A is reporting that the status of 
the bearer still active.  Is there any way for Node A to properly report the 
status of its bearer in this scenario?

Thanks in advance,
Jay P

___
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

___
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion


Re: [tipc-discussion] Disabled port detection

2020-01-14 Thread Jon Maloy
 Hi Jay,Unfortunately there is no such feature in TIPC. TIPC on node A will 
detect that the connectivity to all other nodes is lost, and vice versa, but 
there is no way they can tell *why* this happened.
///Jon

On Monday, January 13, 2020, 12:48:47 PM GMT-5, Jay Pelletier 
 wrote:  
 
 Hello all,

I have a bit of a general question.  Is TIPC able to detect when a port on a 
network switch is disabled?

To further illustrate, here is the scenario:

A 3 node cluster where each node is connected to one another via a network 
switch.  When the port for the connection of one of the nodes (lets call it 
Node A) is disabled (not disconnected), Node A is reporting that the status of 
the bearer still active.  Is there any way for Node A to properly report the 
status of its bearer in this scenario?

Thanks in advance,
Jay P

___
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
  
___
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion