http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/science/11esp.html?nl=todaysheadlinesemc=tha210
Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Danish Institute for Study Abroad (DIS), +45 2065 1360
Dickinson College (on leave 2010/2011)
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:36:44 -0800, Paul C Bernhardt wrote:
I see no problem, also. I thought that the grade distribution was public
information for those of us teaching at public institutions (unless the class
has fewer than 10 students, then it can't be released by FERPA rules).
Well,
Hi,
Now that I am once again able to see and respond to messages on TIPS, I have
a question that is only tangentially related to teaching of psychology. Do
any of you have resources on the ins and outs of being a good chair? Are
there listservs for that? I've read books on it, but I'm still
Carol:
Have you seen this site?
http://www.acenet.edu/resources/chairs/
Ken
---
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D. steel...@appstate.edu
Professor and Assistant Chairperson
Department of Psychology
If your department has graduate programs, there is a Council of chairs of
graduate program in psychology (COGDOP) that has a listserv and an annual
meeting. The chair of the UWF psychology program has always been involved
with that group.
I just googled them and they have a web site:
Hi
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with Seth
Mnookin, who has a book out on the vaccine - autism controversy. In the part I
heard, he gave a very reasonable response on some of the claims made and harm
done by the anti-vaccine group. The audio is at:
Along those same lines, this past weekend's NPR On the Media dealt witht
he same topic. It was most informative. DKH
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Jim Clark j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca wrote:
Hi
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with
Seth Mnookin, who has a
Hi Jim-
This sounds like a good resource. Thanks for passing it along. Unfortunately,
the Jenny McCarthy's of this world don't give up their beliefs that easily.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jenny-mccarthy/vaccine-autism-debate_b_806857.html
Post hoc ergo propter hoc seems to be all of the
On 11 Jan 2011 at 15:52, Jim Clark wrote:
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) aired a radio interview with Seth
Mnookin, who has a book out on
the vaccine - autism controversy. In the part I heard, he gave a very
reasonable response on some of the
claims made and harm done by the
In reading your post, it seems as though your posting is riddled with
sarcasm, ridicule, and a-priori assumption.
When reading it, a scientific attitude is not what comes to mind.
--Mike
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here:
Hi
Absolutely agreed ... it was ironic that the CBC program had first aired a
member of an anti-vaccine group (she is in Winnipeg where I live) before
Mnookin. But it did give him a chance to point out her (and other's) errors.
And he clearly made the point that mentioning a few pro and con
Hi
Personally, I believe that Stephen's posting is quite appropriate given the
subject matter. But putting my naturalistic biases aside, I would assume that
even believers in a supernatural realm would have some issue with claims that
certain people are able to communicate with the deceased
12 matches
Mail list logo
