Good luck re unification.
Archbishop Makarios must be turning over in his
grave.
michael
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5n=Tl=tipso=44932
or send a blank
On Thu, 21 May 2015 07:37:48 -0700, Ken Steele wrote:
On 5/21/2015 10:13 AM, Jim Clark wrote:
Not to quibble, but this study was carried out by Political
Scientists.
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:10 AM, Ken Steele originally wrote:
On 5/21/2015 10:13 AM, Jim Clark wrote:
Not to quibble, but this study was carried out by Political Scientists.
Jim
Jim Clark
Professor Chair of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
204-786-9757
Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
-Original Message-
From: Ken Steele
http://retractionwatch.com/2015/05/20/author-retracts-study-of-changing-minds-on-same-sex-marriage-after-colleague-admits-data-were-faked/
--
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph. D.steel...@appstate.edu
Professor
Not to quibble, but this study was carried out by Political Scientists.
Jim
Jim Clark
Professor Chair of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
204-786-9757
Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
-Original Message-
From: Ken Steele [mailto:steel...@appstate.edu]
Sent:
Dear Tipsters,
Last night, CBC's As it Happens broadcast a very interesting interview with
Dr. Green. At that point he said that the graduate student had not admitted
wrong doing. However, he said that the was almost certain that data were
fabricated.
You can listen here:
The following is a brief article about a presentation made
at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association
(AUA) on May 20, 2015; see:
http://www.firstwordpharma.com/node/1285407?tsid=1#axzz3amtebZZT
Guys, this article is either good news or wince inducing. Or both.
Gals, this
At the risk of being insensitive, how would one go about conducting the
sham portion of the study? Certainly not double-blind, but could there be a
blind group in this case? Wouldn't that tend to confound it?
cd
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Mike Palij m...@nyu.edu wrote:
The following is
On Thu, 21 May 2015 09:04:47 -0700, Carol DeVolder wrote:
At the risk of being insensitive, how would one go about
conducting the sham portion of the study? Certainly not
double-blind, but could there be a blind group in this case?
Wouldn't that tend to confound it?
A couple of points in
