Some subscribers to TIPS and TeachEdPsych might be interested in a post "Is Physics Difficult? [Hake (2010)]. The abstract reads:
********************************** ABSTRACT: Robert Kaiser of the Physics First List wrote (paraphrasing): "Why are we still asking the silly question 'Should children learn some physics ideas in the 7th, 8th or 9th grade?' OBVIOUSLY THEY SHOULD. We have English reading, writing story analysis, etc., from 1st grade to 12th grade. Same for History and Math: children start with almost nothing, but with many years of exposure, they slowly build up skills. Why should science be the one subject in which children (realistically) get almost nothing, and then are thrown to the wolves for 11th grade physics." The same point was made by Ken Ford (1989) in his Guest Comment "Is Physics Difficult." Ford wrote: "Six-year-olds write English and . . . Jeremy Bernstein writes English. What separates them? A long, gradual incline of increased ability, understanding, and practice. [But for Physics] we have fashioned a cliff. There is no gradual ramp, only a near-vertical ascent to its high plateau." See "Physics First: Opening Battle in the War on Science/Math Illiteracy?" at <http://bit.ly/bEEwBa> for cartoons which contrast Lederman's 9th grade physics cliff (page 2) with Ford's P-12 science/math ramp (page 4). ********************************** To access the complete 10 kB post please click on <http://bit.ly/9F2jMJ>. Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which Recognize the Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII) rrh...@earthlink.net http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake "For most men, save the scientific workers, science is a mystery in the hands of initiates, who have become adepts in virtue of following ritualistic ceremonies from which the profane herd is excluded". John Dewey (1927) in "The Public and its Problems " REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 17 November 2010.] Dewey, J. 1927. "The Public and its Problems," a 1954 edition is available from Swallow Press. Amazon.com information at <http://amzn.to/cIW7hf>, note the searchable "Look Inside" feature. Hake, R.R. 2010. "Is Physics Difficult? (was Why are we still asking silly questions?)" online on the OPEN AERA-L archives at <http://bit.ly/9F2jMJ>. Post of 17 Nov 2010 13:11:56-0800 to AERA-L, Net-Gold, & Physics First. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to various discussion lists and are on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/cHd5LJ>. --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6565 or send a blank email to leave-6565-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
