Sorry - I mistitled my last post!

Some subscribers to TIPS might be interested in a recent post 
"Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in Introductory College Physics" 
[Hake (2013)].  The abstract reads:

ABSTRACT: Jane Jackson of the PhysLrnR list has called attention to 
the "Science" article "Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in College 
Science: A Classroom Study of Values Affirmation" (Miyake et al., 
2010) at <http://bit.ly/1cGmBKQ>.  The abstract reads, in part: "The 
current study tested the effectiveness of a psychological 
intervention, called 'values affirmation,' in reducing the gender 
achievement gap in a college-level introductory physics class. [It] 
reduced the male-female performance and learning difference 
substantially and elevated women's modal grades from the C to B 
range. . . . .  A brief psychological intervention may be a promising 
way to address the gender gap in science performance and learning." 
In addition to the elevation of women's modal grades, Miyake et al., 
showed that the "values affirmation" intervention substantially 
increased women's end-of semester scores on the Force Motion 
Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE).

However, PhysLrnR's alert Antti Savinainen (2013) pointed to:

a. The fact the results of Miyake et al. (2010) were not fully 
replicated in a follow-up study "Replicating a Self-Affirmation 
Intervention to Address Gender Differences: Successes and Challenges" 
[Kost-Smith et al. (2011)] at <http://bit.ly/17qrMHG>.  They wrote: 
". . . . we find similar patterns [to Miyake et al., 2010 for] exams 
and course grades, but do not observe these patterns [for] the FMCE."

b. The scholarly review "The gender gap on concept inventories in 
physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors 
influence the gap" by Madsen, McKagan, & Sayre (2013) at 
<http://bit.ly/14O57cz>. Their abstract reads in part: "Based on our 
analysis of 24 published articles comparing the impact of 34 factors 
that could potentially influence the gender gap, no single factor is 
sufficient to explain the gap. Several high-profile studies that have 
claimed to account for or reduce the gender gap have failed to be 
replicated in subsequent studies, suggesting that isolated claims of 
explanations of the gender gap should be interpreted with caution. 
For example, claims that the gender gap could be eliminated through 
interactive engagement teaching methods or through a 'values 
affirmation exercise' were not supported by subsequent studies. . . . 
. . . the gender gap is most likely due to the combination of many 
small factors, rather than due to any one factor that can be easily 
modified."
************************************************

To access the complete 25 kB post please click on <http://bit.ly/19nKqCl>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: <http://bit.ly/a6M5y0>
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: <http://bit.ly/9nGd3M>
Academia: <http://bit.ly/a8ixxm>
Blog: <http://bit.ly/9yGsXh>
GooglePlus: <http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE>
Google Scholar:  <http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3>
Twitter: <http://bit.ly/juvd52>
Facebook: <http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm>
LinkedIn: <http://linkd.in/14uycpW>

"A paper that does not have references is like a child without an 
escort walking at night in a big city it does not know: isolated, 
lost, anything may happen to it."
        - Bruno Latour (1987).

REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 16 
August 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. "Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in Introductory 
College Physics,"  online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at 
<http://bit.ly/19nKqCl>. Post of 16 Aug 2013 18:02:49-0400 to AERA-L 
and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being 
distributed to various discussion lists and are on my blog 
"Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/1cTqqvf> with a provision for 
comment.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=27135
or send a blank email to 
leave-27135-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to