Hi
A NYTimes article summarizing some interesting behavioral science phenomena at
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/opinion/07brooks.html?_r=1nl=todaysheadlinesemc=a212
provoked a substantial number of depressingly negative comments. Perhaps they
are former students of Michael Smith's?
Take
lolthat's hillarious...the studies were pretty funny too (except
of course for the fact that money may have been wasted on them).
But what comes through clearly is that the public knows best...they
aren't fooled by the eggheads (thank God!).
--Mike
---
You are currently subscribed to tips
Hi Michael
I wonder if you ought not to get your institution to remove the mention of
psychology as a science?
http://www.taylor-edu.ca/tayloruc/academics/pdfs/Program%20Brochure%20-%20Psychology.pdf
Take care
Jim
James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:41:19 -0800, Jim Clark wrote:
Hi
A NYTimes article summarizing some interesting behavioral
science phenomena at
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/opinion/07brooks.html?_r=1nl=todaysheadlinesemc=a212
provoked a substantial number of depressingly negative comments.
: Mike Palij
Subject: re: [tips] More anti-social-science ... from the public.
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:41:19 -0800, Jim Clark wrote:
Hi
A NYTimes article summarizing some interesting behavioral science
phenomena at
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/opinion/07brooks.html?_r=1nl=todaysh
