Mike Palij writes:
>In my original post to TiPS, I wrote: |two papers that were
>submitted to the journal Science that |the U.S. government
>wants censored, that is, details removed |which would prevent
>others from duplicating the work; Now, anyone involved in
>experimental or other types of resea
Mike Palij writes:
>I note that you did not actually deal with my question.
namely
>>How should scientists react to having the U.S. government
>>or any government censor ("redact") published scientific reports?
It was implicit in my latest response (see below). Since your original
email was in th
In my original post to TiPS, I wrote:
|two papers that were submitted to the journal Science that
|the U.S. government wants censored, that is, details removed
|which would prevent others from duplicating the work;
Now, anyone involved in experimental or other types of research
would realize that
According to the Independent, "a group of special scientific advisors
to the US Government decided that the details of the two studies into
H5N1 bird flu were too sensitive to be published in full and
recommended redactions to the manuscripts rather than a complete ban on
publication."
The US
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:31:01 -0800, Allen Esterson wrote:
>In the context of the claimed discovery that a mutant and highly
>dangerous strain of avian flu reportedly "fatal in 60 per cent of human
Netherlands science laboratory, Mike Palij asks:
>>How should scientists react to having the U.S. gove
In the context of the claimed discovery that a mutant and highly
dangerous strain of avian flu reportedly "fatal in 60 per cent of human
cases" has been developed by a relatively simple method in a
Netherlands science laboratory, Mike Palij asks:
>How should scientists react to having the U.S. g