Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-30 Thread Guilherme Polo
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Allen Taylor >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-27 09:43 >>> >>

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-29 Thread Guilherme Polo
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Allen Taylor > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-27 09:43 >>> >>>ii) It doesn't use a busy loop in order to get the thread responsible >>>for th

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-27 Thread Guilherme Polo
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Allen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-27 09:43 >>> >>ii) It doesn't use a busy loop in order to get the thread responsible >>for the interpreter, instead it will re-schedule the call as much as >>needed (tests nee

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-27 Thread Allen Taylor
>>> "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-27 09:43 >>> >ii) It doesn't use a busy loop in order to get the thread responsible >for the interpreter, instead it will re-schedule the call as much as >needed (tests needed for possible problems here) By "re-schedule", do you mean to use a queuing

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-27 Thread Guilherme Polo
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Allen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guilherme, > I will cobble something together in the next few days and post it. > If you are working on redoing _tkinter, would you consider taking the same > approach to thread-safety as I did in mtTkinter? If so, perha

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-27 Thread Allen Taylor
Hi Guilherme, I will cobble something together in the next few days and post it. If you are working on redoing _tkinter, would you consider taking the same approach to thread-safety as I did in mtTkinter? If so, perhaps mtTkinter could be obsoleted. Allen >>> "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-11-26 Thread Guilherme Polo
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Allen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fixed some fairly major bugs and uploaded to > http://tkinter.unpythonic.net/wiki/mtTkinter. > Allen Hi Allen, Is there any possibility of including samples that demonstrate bad behaviour against current _tkinter but works

[Tkinter-discuss] mtTkinter version 0.2 uploaded

2008-10-29 Thread Allen Taylor
Fixed some fairly major bugs and uploaded to http://tkinter.unpythonic.net/wiki/mtTkinter. Allen ___ Tkinter-discuss mailing list Tkinter-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tkinter-discuss