* On 2021 06 Sep 22:13 -0500, Doug Smith wrote:
> > Please don't blame Tlf here. That is totally my doing as that is the
> > data I put in for that field in my local template.
> >
> > Looking at the relevant Cabrillo V 3 specification[1], I see that
> > Location has three categories, ARRL section
On 9/6/21 8:35 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2021 06 Sep 17:41 -0500, Doug Smith wrote:
For years I was the adjudicator for the TNQP and still am the backup guy. I
haven't run Nate's log through the checking software yet but it looks
straightforward & I don't remember having significant issues
* On 2021 06 Sep 17:41 -0500, Doug Smith wrote:
> For years I was the adjudicator for the TNQP and still am the backup guy. I
> haven't run Nate's log through the checking software yet but it looks
> straightforward & I don't remember having significant issues with TLF output
> in the past.
Hi Do
For years I was the adjudicator for the TNQP and still am the backup
guy. I haven't run Nate's log through the checking software yet but it
looks straightforward & I don't remember having significant issues with
TLF output in the past.
One thing I did notice is the LOCATION: tag in the Cabri
Sorry this is after the fact as the Tennessee QP was yesterday.
Overall, this was easy for Tlf as the exchange was signal report and
county (instate) and signal report and state/province (outstate). The
only difference from the KS QP was making the mults per band rather than
once.
As usual, my f
