Hi,
I'm a long-time lurker on this list, and a long-time user of TLF
(since '04 or so) just getting back into contesting after a life
detour. I think TLF is great! So in addition to SM0RUX I would
like to offer many thanks to all the developers that keep this project
moving forward. Completed
Hi all,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:01:53PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> Hi Ervin,
>
> sounds good so far. If there are no other suggestions from Joop or
> others just go ahead.
thanks - right, I'll start to make it soon.
73, Ervin
Hi Ervin,
sounds good so far. If there are no other suggestions from Joop or
others just go ahead.
73, de Tom DL1JBE
Am Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:17:13 +0100
schrieb Ervin Hegedüs :
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > Hi Joop,
> >
> > I assume you
Thomas,
Just throwing out an idea here, would it be possible to have one
keyword (say CUSTOM) for the rules file, and for that particular
contest the user could build their own multiplier file? Might be
tedious once, but might provide an interim work-around until something
more sophisticated
Sounds good Ervin / Thomas!
I was thinking of a more simple solution, something like: if there is a
template file in the current directory, just add the QSO data to it. The
cabrillo file then should be edited later.
But.. the solution suggested by Ervin is even better, thumbs up!
73 de Joop
Op 17-11-19 om 18:19 schreef Thomas Beierlein:
But I fear there will be another combination of multipliers
poping up soon which we do not have in our repertoire.
So a better solution is needed - same goes for point scoring.
I did some investigation how other contest programs solve these
Thomas,
Just throwing out an idea here, would it be possible to have one
keyword (say CUSTOM) for the rules file, and for that particular
contest the user could build their own multiplier file? Might be
tedious once, but might provide an interim work-around until something
more sophisticated
