Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)

2013-11-04 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Hello everyone :),

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
 Hi Ervin, Fred and Ed,
 
 I was away some days, but let me add my 2 ct's to the discussion.
 
 - The activation of tlf's digimode got explained last by Fred in his
 post from 26 Sep 2012 (should be still in the archive). Besides the
 mentioned entries for logcfg.dat you need to activate the miniterm
 window with ':miniterm' from within tlf's callinput field.
 Maybe we should write a README.digi and add it to the distribution.

ok, but I think if somebody wants to use Tlf for RTTY, it can be
found the required infos on the net. Eg. I found it in Rein's
original post, about in 2005 or 2006.

 - The excessive LF's should be gone in the tlf-1.2.0pre series. 

ack,

 - I had planned to code a native fldigi interface in spring but as it
   was a busy year here it is still on the todo list. I planned to add a
   new FLDIGI keyword and use the socket interface for communication.
   The old GMFSK mechanism will be gone in fldigi in some time.

what do think about this, when do you implement this socket
interface? Do you need any help?
 
 - Fred your idea with selecting the received QTC via mouse is nice but
   at the moment there is little to no support for mouse recognition in
   tlf. Main reason is the hard coded key handling in 'onechar.c'. I
   have some experimental work here to switch to native ncurses keyboard
   interface. That will allows us to add mouse handling to tlf. It is
   nearly done but needs testing.

I agree this.

 As tlf-1.2.0 still needs some work I have backported at least the new
 cabrillo v3  handling to tlf 1.1.x series and will release 1.1.7 in
 next days.
 
 For 1.2.0 to be ready I want to fix the following two problems first:
 
 - The above mentioned FLDIGI interface for digimode.
 - A unified handling of scoring during QSO entry and reload of log
   after startup. At the moment that are two different code path and
   every change to one of them needs to be carefully balanced out on the
   other way. I dropped already two or three times into that problem.
 
 Maybe WAEDC handling is ready at that time too and we can add it to
 the new 1.2.0. 

Yesterday I've comitted the QTC's receive direction to WAEDC-QTC
branch. Here are the remaining tasks:
- in CW and DIGIMODES send messages; I mean, if operator wants to
  send QTC, Tlf could handle the full block. If operator receives
  QTC's, Tlf could send ROGER or R, RPT NN or other
  messages.
  I think these aren't too big challanges.
- automatic receive of QTC
  That's a big question, how should we use that, and maybe it
  depends the DIGIMODE interface.
- merged QTC's with QSO's in Cabrillo

I have an idea, just start for the collective thinking: if other
station asks the 'QTC QRV?', and operator press ALT+r when the
current field is serial, Tlf opens the QTC receive window, and
send a 'QTC QRV' message. Thereafter looks the RTTY client
messages, and try to recognize the format of lines. If a line
matches with a predefined format, it will be handled accordingly.

I think it could be doing that in a new thread (posix thread),
which reads the RTTY client messages, handle it, and fill the
receive window fields. Till the operator can edit the fields if
required, and can mark the line with ENTER (*). Otherwise it will
be marked as complete. The status will be indicated in left to
the line. Please don't forget, the message sending is not
implemented!

I'm afraid I don't have enough time to finish to merge the QTC's
with QSO's in Cabrillo till WAEDC-RTTY contest (to this weekend),
if somebody could help me, I appreciate it :). First, I will
implement the message sending, then handling the receive of
QTC's.


Any remarks/ideas are welcomes :)


73,

Ervin
HA2OS


*: in receive mode if any field contains a '?' (question mark),
that line will be marked as incomplete. When you are in a kind of
this line, and pressing ENTER, then Tlf will send PSE RPT NN.
The message sending is not implemented currently.


___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)

2013-11-04 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Hello Fred,

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:55:51PM +0100, Fred Siegmund wrote:
 Ok, there seems to be one significant difference to CW/SSB. The QTCs
 in RTTY are transmitted in batches. 

yes, that's the challenge :)

Till I made all of the WAEDC modifications (first patch was only
the correct handling of points and multipliers), I've tried to
keep in mind this difference. Eg: in CW/SSB modes, QSO's allowed
only in EU-DX relation, but in RTTY every station should work
with from anywhere. In CW/SSB modes, only the DX stations should
send QTC to only the EU stations, in RTTY all station should send
QTC to everyone, except same continent. And techically, in RTTY
the QTC are sending in batch mode, instead of one by one.

 This
 makes it somehow difficult to keep it compatible, but its possible
 (different DIGIMODE handling). 

yes, and (I hope :)) my codes handles it correctly.

 There need
 to be a macro to request to repeat a selected line. Another macro
 for repeat all. When ALT-R is pressed TLF should be looking for a
 line begining with QTC xxx/xx to have a trigger point. And then copy
 the whole block in.

I found out that if a line contains '?', that will be signed as
incomplete - this is the macro. Then if you press ENTER, Tlf
will send PSE RPT #N immediately (!). If all lines are marked
as complete (simply press ENTER, and line doesn't contain '?'),
and then press ENTER, Tlf will send 'TNX QTC NNN/NN' or any other
message, and close the window. This method can work only in RTTY,
but the different from CW/SSB is not so much: in that modes, if
you marked a QTC as complete, the 'R' signal will send
immediately, not after if you get all QTC's.

Hope this should be usable, but if you have any idea, please let
me know.


73,

Ervin
HA2OS


 73 Fred
 
 
 Am 03.11.2013 10:49, schrieb Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS:
 hello,
 
 On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:04:26AM +, FS wrote:
 Yes, that could work. Lets say, the user enters the the series
 number like xx/xx, and the QRV message is sent, TLF is triggered to
 take everyting in a pattern like, by grabing it from gMFSK.log:
  cc nnn
 time call   number
 Till I looked the examples of QTC, especially RTTY mode, I found
 this (very good) summary:
 
 http://www.guernsey.net/~pcooper/waedc.html
 
 On this page the author said there are several forms of QTC:
 
 So, you will end up with something like this:
 001/10
 0012 G3URA 049
 0013/AA5AU/056
 0014-RA9FOE-012
 etc for ten lines.
 
 So, the separator sign should be   (space), / (slash), -
 (hyphen/minus) character. That's no problem, but it would be nice
 to know, is there any other formula to separate the fields, or
 operators (and softares) only uses these?
 
 I think I can handle all or them above.
 
 I a not aware if they send in RTTY shortend versions, like two
 figures for the time, or so.
 I don't know that too... :)
 
 Maybe the user could be asked if he
 wants to accept it, if yes a ROGER is send otherwise a PSE REPEAT.
 Hmmm... I'm not sure is it a good solution. Otherwise, if
 somebody had WAEDC-RTTY, and received many QTC's, please confirm
 that: anybody (or any software) uses the different formula that
 listed above, or not?
 
 
 thanks, 73:
 
 
 Ervin
 HA2OS
 
 
 
 ___
 Tlf-devel mailing list
 Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel

___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)

2013-11-04 Thread FS
Yes, that sound good. I am only a little bit afraid of garbage while 
decoding (because of weak signals). But thats also a question how good

the squelch is set.

73 Fred

On 11/04/2013 09:09 AM, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:

Hello Fred,

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:55:51PM +0100, Fred Siegmund wrote:

Ok, there seems to be one significant difference to CW/SSB. The QTCs
in RTTY are transmitted in batches.


yes, that's the challenge :)

Till I made all of the WAEDC modifications (first patch was only
the correct handling of points and multipliers), I've tried to
keep in mind this difference. Eg: in CW/SSB modes, QSO's allowed
only in EU-DX relation, but in RTTY every station should work
with from anywhere. In CW/SSB modes, only the DX stations should
send QTC to only the EU stations, in RTTY all station should send
QTC to everyone, except same continent. And techically, in RTTY
the QTC are sending in batch mode, instead of one by one.


This
makes it somehow difficult to keep it compatible, but its possible
(different DIGIMODE handling).


yes, and (I hope :)) my codes handles it correctly.


There need
to be a macro to request to repeat a selected line. Another macro
for repeat all. When ALT-R is pressed TLF should be looking for a
line begining with QTC xxx/xx to have a trigger point. And then copy
the whole block in.


I found out that if a line contains '?', that will be signed as
incomplete - this is the macro. Then if you press ENTER, Tlf
will send PSE RPT #N immediately (!). If all lines are marked
as complete (simply press ENTER, and line doesn't contain '?'),
and then press ENTER, Tlf will send 'TNX QTC NNN/NN' or any other
message, and close the window. This method can work only in RTTY,
but the different from CW/SSB is not so much: in that modes, if
you marked a QTC as complete, the 'R' signal will send
immediately, not after if you get all QTC's.

Hope this should be usable, but if you have any idea, please let
me know.


73,

Ervin
HA2OS



73 Fred


Am 03.11.2013 10:49, schrieb Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS:

hello,

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:04:26AM +, FS wrote:

Yes, that could work. Lets say, the user enters the the series
number like xx/xx, and the QRV message is sent, TLF is triggered to
take everyting in a pattern like, by grabing it from gMFSK.log:
 cc nnn
time call   number

Till I looked the examples of QTC, especially RTTY mode, I found
this (very good) summary:

http://www.guernsey.net/~pcooper/waedc.html

On this page the author said there are several forms of QTC:

So, you will end up with something like this:
001/10
0012 G3URA 049
0013/AA5AU/056
0014-RA9FOE-012
etc for ten lines.

So, the separator sign should be   (space), / (slash), -
(hyphen/minus) character. That's no problem, but it would be nice
to know, is there any other formula to separate the fields, or
operators (and softares) only uses these?

I think I can handle all or them above.


I a not aware if they send in RTTY shortend versions, like two
figures for the time, or so.

I don't know that too... :)


Maybe the user could be asked if he
wants to accept it, if yes a ROGER is send otherwise a PSE REPEAT.

Hmmm... I'm not sure is it a good solution. Otherwise, if
somebody had WAEDC-RTTY, and received many QTC's, please confirm
that: anybody (or any software) uses the different formula that
listed above, or not?


thanks, 73:


Ervin
HA2OS




___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel





___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)

2013-11-04 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello Fred,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:51:44AM +, FS wrote:
 Yes, that sound good. I am only a little bit afraid of garbage while
 decoding (because of weak signals). But thats also a question how
 good
 the squelch is set.

yes, I tried to think that, and for this reason I choosed this
method, what I described.

I think there isn't any way to full automatization to receive the
QTC - like we couldn't catch the callsign and/or RST and serial.


73,


Ervin
HA2OS


___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Ervin,

Am Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:48:57 +0100
schrieb Ervin Hegedüs airw...@gmail.com:

 
  - I had planned to code a native fldigi interface in spring but as
  it was a busy year here it is still on the todo list. I planned to
  add a new FLDIGI keyword and use the socket interface for
  communication. The old GMFSK mechanism will be gone in fldigi in
  some time.
 
 what do think about this, when do you implement this socket
 interface? Do you need any help?

Help will be useful. But I fear implementation can only be done here in
next 1..2 month. At the moment there is no urgent need for it, we can
use the old GMFSK interface for now.

But we should discuss that in a separate thread.
  
 
 I'm afraid I don't have enough time to finish to merge the QTC's
 with QSO's in Cabrillo till WAEDC-RTTY contest (to this weekend),
 if somebody could help me, I appreciate it :). First, I will
 implement the message sending, then handling the receive of
 QTC's.
 
I can have a look into it near the end of the week. Luckily we need the
Cabrillo formatting only after the contest for preparation of the final
log.

Main question is how you store the QTC send/receive information. With
the new Cabrillo handling in place it should be not too difficult to
extend it for the QTC's.

73, de Tom DL1JBE.
-- 
Do what is needful!
Ursula LeGuin: Earthsea
--


___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


[Tlf-devel] Autosend feature

2013-11-04 Thread Martin Kratoska

Was: Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)
---
Dne 3.11.2013 22:09, Fred Siegmund napsal(a):
 Hi Martin, which autosend feature do you mean? I worked with TRLOGLinux
 and was not very satisfied, namely
 the bandmap is very slow and there some inherited things from the
 original program that are very stupid. Like its
 not possible to edit the complete log. These are points were a distinct
 progression from TRLog is visible (already
 developed by Rein).

 73 Fred


Hi Fred,

the Autosend feature is that which is in TRlog activated with

AUTO CALL TERMINATE = TRUE
AUTO SEND CHARACTER COUNT = 4

(here the autosend starts at 4th character). Better is an example:

OK1RRA comes back to your CQ and you want to reply. So you type OK1R (4 
characters) and your program begins to send. You are now in a hurry (a 
bit :-) because you must complete typing the whole call till the sending 
procedure catches you, here you must add RA. Then follows the 
exchange, the first ENTER logs in the QSO.


Some OPs hate this option, some (me including) are in love with this. 
Except typing the call, you need only a single ENTER to make a complete 
QSO. Isn't nice such option? Also, many other progs have this feature...


Of course, I make thorough tests of any TRLOGLinux version but it is 
still far away from an useful program. Many poor bottlenecks inherited 
from the obsolete DOS version - not only the impossibility to edit the 
complete log but the telnet operations, the hardcoded (thus very 
limited) support of quite few radio models, the predefined exchange 
types (an obvious quirk when the program tries to think for the 
operator) and much more. Anyway, TRlog (the original DOS version) 
introduced a new philosophy which is still unbeaten today. tlf should 
get much inspiration here. QTC handling in WAE is an example...


CW/SSB contesters here know all the tricks of N1MM, TR4W, WriteLog and 
other powerful software packages used by winners. I believe that tlf 
should come close to these top runners. First if meets all requirements 
of top grade CW/SSB contesters, we should start with digimodes. Now (it 
seems at least to me) is too early, there is a danger that we will have 
an universal multimode program which does all, but does all quite bad, 
with many unnecessary typing etc. which can make a program useless for a 
tired operator, who is in a contest for whole weekend.


Anyway, I am very happy with tlf. This is the reason of my support of 
this software (TRLOGLinux and so2sdr being still ignored here...). Kudos 
to all authors and contributors, also my apologies that I am not a 
coder, I am just operator who can make some tests and suggest and old, 
forgotten feature.


73,
Martin, OK1RR



___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] TLF RTTY with Fldigi

2013-11-04 Thread Ervin Hegedüs - HA2OS
Hello Ed,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:36:28PM -0500, Ed wrote:
 
 I used some of Fred's post from 2012 and came up with the following:
 
 If you want to use tlf in a RTTY contest with fldigi. Add this to the 
 logcfg.dat:
 
 RTTYMODE
 GMFSK=/home/youruser/gMFSK.log 
 DIGIMODEM=/home/youruser/gmfsk_autofile
 
 Create a file in /home/youruser named:
 
 TLFfldigi 
 
 and one named
 
 gMFSK.log
 
 and one named
 
 gmfsk_autofile
 
 In tlf you need to open the miniterm:
 
 :mini

thanks for above,
 
 I tested this using the CQ WW as a testbed. Worked perfectly.
 
 I also went back to 2006 and read through some of Rein's post about
 using gMFSK. Without the special version of gMFSK that Rein used,
 I'm afraid using another verson may not work.

that's the main problem: I don't find anywhere that patch(set),
so gMFSK is unusable.

==snip==

At this moment I'm tryin the Fldigi, and looks like that works with
same settings like you described above (doh! - fldigi uses gmfsk*
prefix... why?)

I think I can start to test the QTC send and receive
implementation.


thanks for your help :),


73

Ervin
HA2OS


-- 
I � UTF-8

___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] Autosend feature

2013-11-04 Thread FS

Ok, interesting indeed. The functionality is basicly there, but broken.
I always wondered what such a important key like space does in TRLOG 
mode. Well, it just doesn't work like intended (arrow down is the same).

The same is true for the :char command (autosend).
See the original meaning:
http://pa0r.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/03/29/autostart_cw_for_tlf.html

I think its a bug. ;-)

73 Fred

On 11/04/2013 07:39 PM, Martin Kratoska wrote:

Was: Re: [Tlf-devel] WAEDC QTC - v0.002 release :)
---
Dne 3.11.2013 22:09, Fred Siegmund napsal(a):
  Hi Martin, which autosend feature do you mean? I worked with TRLOGLinux
  and was not very satisfied, namely
  the bandmap is very slow and there some inherited things from the
  original program that are very stupid. Like its
  not possible to edit the complete log. These are points were a distinct
  progression from TRLog is visible (already
  developed by Rein).
 
  73 Fred


Hi Fred,

the Autosend feature is that which is in TRlog activated with

AUTO CALL TERMINATE = TRUE
AUTO SEND CHARACTER COUNT = 4

(here the autosend starts at 4th character). Better is an example:

OK1RRA comes back to your CQ and you want to reply. So you type OK1R (4
characters) and your program begins to send. You are now in a hurry (a
bit :-) because you must complete typing the whole call till the sending
procedure catches you, here you must add RA. Then follows the
exchange, the first ENTER logs in the QSO.

Some OPs hate this option, some (me including) are in love with this.
Except typing the call, you need only a single ENTER to make a complete
QSO. Isn't nice such option? Also, many other progs have this feature...

Of course, I make thorough tests of any TRLOGLinux version but it is
still far away from an useful program. Many poor bottlenecks inherited
from the obsolete DOS version - not only the impossibility to edit the
complete log but the telnet operations, the hardcoded (thus very
limited) support of quite few radio models, the predefined exchange
types (an obvious quirk when the program tries to think for the
operator) and much more. Anyway, TRlog (the original DOS version)
introduced a new philosophy which is still unbeaten today. tlf should
get much inspiration here. QTC handling in WAE is an example...

CW/SSB contesters here know all the tricks of N1MM, TR4W, WriteLog and
other powerful software packages used by winners. I believe that tlf
should come close to these top runners. First if meets all requirements
of top grade CW/SSB contesters, we should start with digimodes. Now (it
seems at least to me) is too early, there is a danger that we will have
an universal multimode program which does all, but does all quite bad,
with many unnecessary typing etc. which can make a program useless for a
tired operator, who is in a contest for whole weekend.

Anyway, I am very happy with tlf. This is the reason of my support of
this software (TRLOGLinux and so2sdr being still ignored here...). Kudos
to all authors and contributors, also my apologies that I am not a
coder, I am just operator who can make some tests and suggest and old,
forgotten feature.

73,
Martin, OK1RR



___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel




___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel