On Thursday 23 July 2015 14:21:15 Dave Garrett wrote:
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 01:10:30 pm Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Stephen Farrell
stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
A suggestion - could we remove mention of anything that
is not a MUST or SHOULD
On Friday, July 24, 2015 01:18:41 pm Hubert Kario wrote:
On Friday 24 July 2015 12:57:42 Dave Garrett wrote:
To be clear, the wording I have in the PR is not this broad. It only
requires aborting if export ciphers were offered by a TLS 1.3+ client, not
just any client.
and how a server
On Friday, July 24, 2015 01:50:31 am Andrei Popov wrote:
I'm proposing renaming insufficient_security to
unsupported_cipher_suites, which is explicitly what it's been for since
TLS 1.0.
Not quite. Insufficient_security alert is defined as follows:
Returned instead of handshake_failure
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:10:30PM +0200, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
A suggestion - could we remove mention of anything that
is not a MUST or SHOULD ciphersuite from the TLS1.3 document
and then have someone
* Andrei Popov andrei.po...@microsoft.com [25/07/2015 01:26:41] wrote:
Yes, this sounds good to me too.
+1.
Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
