Hi
No big changes:
- Replaced the reference to the CFRG draft with RFC 7748
- Some editorial improvements by Martin Thomson.
So there are still a few open issues (you can see them on github:
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/issues
We’re also waiting for the CFRG EdDSA draft (now in RGLC) t
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Ear
On Sun, January 31, 2016 10:00 pm, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 1 February 2016 at 16:56, Dan Harkins wrote:
From a protocol perspective, they are the same. The distinction at
>>> the protocol level between ECDH_RSA (for example) and ECDH_anon is
>>> that ECDH_anon requires a ServerKeyShare m
If you have X25519 key exchange for TLS and are willing to help OpenSSL interop
(soon), please drop me a line.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mail
If you keep using the same [EC]DH keys indefinitely, you're merely
pseudonymous, not anonymous :-)
Without a naming precedent, I'd still prefer [EC]DHE_anon over [EC]DH_anon
(and possibly "unauth" over "anon", because "anon" could be interpreted as
overpromising), but given the existing naming pat
