Re: [TLS] Deprecating alert levels

2016-10-24 Thread Kyle Nekritz
+1 to both Martin and ekr, I think simplifying these alerts with clearly defined behavior for each alert description is the best way forward. Kyle -Original Message- From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Thomson Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:18 PM To: Eric

Re: [TLS] How should inability to access key revocation lists impact the TLS handshake?

2016-10-24 Thread Eric Rescorla
"certificate_unknown" seems like it should be fine for this On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Xiaoyin Liu wrote: > But I think the problem is that there is no TLS alert for “revocation > status inaccessible”. > > > > Best, > > Xiaoyin > > *From: *Salz, Rich

Re: [TLS] How should inability to access key revocation lists impact the TLS handshake?

2016-10-24 Thread Xiaoyin Liu
But I think the problem is that there is no TLS alert for “revocation status inaccessible”. Best, Xiaoyin From: Salz, Rich Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:15 PM To: Ryan Carboni; tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] How

[TLS] How should inability to access key revocation lists impact the TLS handshake?

2016-10-24 Thread Ryan Carboni
How should inability to access key revocation lists impact the TLS handshake, if previous public keys and/or certificate hashes are not cached? I cannot see this in the standard. Considering that all one has to do is DDOS a certificate authority nowadays...

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

2016-10-24 Thread Andrei Popov
+1 Definitely good enough starting point. Cheers, Andrei From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xiaoyin Liu Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 10:02 AM To: Eric Rescorla ; Stephen Farrell Cc: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of

Re: [TLS] IPR Disclosure Eric Rescorla's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-tls13 belonging to Groupe Des Ecoles Des Telecommunications - Ecole Nationale Superieure Des Telecommunications

2016-10-24 Thread Watson Ladd
See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4306#page-7, published a year before the priority date of the patent. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:53 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote: > Dear Eric Rescorla: > > > An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "The > Transport

[TLS] IPR Disclosure Eric Rescorla's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-tls13 belonging to Groupe Des Ecoles Des Telecommunications - Ecole Nationale Superieure Des Telecommunications

2016-10-24 Thread IETF Secretariat
Dear Eric Rescorla: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3" (draft-ietf-tls-tls13) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures"

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-00.txt

2016-10-24 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, My understanding is that the updated version should not introduce any profile. Am I correct ? BR, Daniel On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Migault wrote: > Hi, > > I am not very clear on how to update the text of the draft. The problem > seems to me