> On 23 Jun 2017, at 5:10, Timothy Jackson wrote:
>
> +1 and a preference for MUST, just so people understand the importance.
>
> Since we're agreed that 0-RTT data and 1-RTT data have (almost) the same
> security properties once the handshake completes, it seems to
On 06/22/2017 09:10 PM, Timothy Jackson wrote:
> +1 and a preference for MUST, just so people understand the importance.
>
> Since we're agreed that 0-RTT data and 1-RTT data have (almost) the
> same security properties once the handshake completes, it seems to me,
> unless I've missed something,
+1 and a preference for MUST, just so people understand the importance.
Since we're agreed that 0-RTT data and 1-RTT data have (almost) the same
security properties once the handshake completes, it seems to me, unless I've
missed something, that a lot of protocols will accept 0-RTT but withhold