Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

The working has expressed consensus to work on the problem of SNI encryption. More work is needed to determine the technical approach to SNI encryption. The chairs believe there is enough interest and energy to adopt this draft and continue work within the working group instead of asking the

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-record-limit

All done, including the PR being merged into the editor's copy. On 29 August 2017 at 00:03, Sean Turner wrote: > It looks like we have consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. > I’ve set up a GH repo in the TLSWG > repo:https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit.

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. Title : Record Size Limit Extension for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Author : Martin Thomson

Re: [TLS] WG Call for Adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts continued

It looks like we have consensus after the 2nd WG call for adoption to adopt this draft as a working group item as the draft was revised to address concerns brought up during the 1st WG call for adoption. I’ve set up a GH repo at: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts. Please submit the current

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-record-limit

It looks like we have consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. I’ve set up a GH repo in the TLSWG repo:https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit. Please submit the current draft as a working group item with the filename draft-ietf-tls-record-limit.If you can hold off on