Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-03.txt

I’ll set the datatracker status. spt > On Jan 15, 2018, at 16:34, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > Hiya, > > Kathleen's a bit busy at the moment so asked that, as shepherd, > I kick off the WGLC for this one (as the two chairs are authors). > The idea is that I'll

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-03.txt

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > So this starts a 2-week WGLC, ending on January 29th. Ship it! Nits: 6. Adding recommended Column <- capital R, consider "Recommended" to match later text. 8. TLS ExtensionType Values <- TLS 1.3 adds more

[TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-03.txt

Hiya, Kathleen's a bit busy at the moment so asked that, as shepherd, I kick off the WGLC for this one (as the two chairs are authors). The idea is that I'll summarise the WGLC thread to her and she can then decide if this is ready to move forward. So this starts a 2-week WGLC, ending on

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

EKR, If you are going to add this (seems like a reasonable idea to me) please note the minor typo of “tailure”, which I presume should be failure. Tim Sent from Email+ secured by MobileIron From: "Colm MacCárthaigh"

Re: [TLS] The future devices that will break TLS 1.4

On Saturday, 13 January 2018 03:31:23 CET Christian Huitema wrote: > On 1/12/2018 1:53 PM, Dan Wing wrote: > > The question I want to ask: What can we do *now* to stop this from > > happening when TLS 1.4 will be deployed? I have the feeling GREASE > > won't be enough... > > Data sets. Machine