[TLS] EXTENDED Last Call: (Record Size Limit Extension for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG (tls) to consider the following document: - 'Record Size Limit Extension for Transport Layer Security (TLS)' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this

Re: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: (with COMMENT)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > > My comments are less about middleboxes (TLS-terminating corporate > proxies trusted by the user's browser) and more about unwanted > active MiTM attacks. If the MiTM attacker has obtained WebPKI > (PKIX)

Re: [TLS] [tlswg/tls13-spec] Add the record header to additional data for AEAD (de)protection. (#1158)

This would change the wire protocol yet again. Is it really necessary or just a nice-to-have? ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Op 22-02-18 om 16:44 schreef Shumon Huque: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Paul Wouters > wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Shumon Huque wrote: > > Okay, got it. For people that have already implemented this, I think > there has been