Re: [TLS] IANA Registry for TLS-Flags

2021-12-13 Thread Yoav Nir
So now that that is settled, publish a new draft? > On 13 Dec 2021, at 21:19, Martin Thomson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 01:47, Salz, Rich wrote: >>> How about we split the difference and go with the first 0-15 flags for >>> standards action? We can keep the initial value of 8

Re: [TLS] IANA Registry for TLS-Flags

2021-12-13 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 01:47, Salz, Rich wrote: >>How about we split the difference and go with the first 0-15 flags for >> standards action? We can keep the initial value of 8 for >> cross-sni-resumption since that document is going through the process. (We >> could also make it 7 or

Re: [TLS] IANA Registry for TLS-Flags

2021-12-13 Thread Salz, Rich
>How about we split the difference and go with the first 0-15 flags for > standards action? We can keep the initial value of 8 for cross-sni-resumption > since that document is going through the process. (We could also make it 7 or > lower so we're not wasting an empty octet for this flag,

Re: [TLS] IANA Registry for TLS-Flags

2021-12-13 Thread Eric Rescorla
That's fine by me. On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:31 AM Christopher Wood wrote: > How about we split the difference and go with the first 0-15 flags for > standards action? We can keep the initial value of 8 for > cross-sni-resumption since that document is going through the process. (We > could

Re: [TLS] IANA Registry for TLS-Flags

2021-12-13 Thread Christopher Wood
How about we split the difference and go with the first 0-15 flags for standards action? We can keep the initial value of 8 for cross-sni-resumption since that document is going through the process. (We could also make it 7 or lower so we're not wasting an empty octet for this flag, should