[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-subcerts-13.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. Title : Delegated Credentials for (D)TLS Authors : Richard Barnes Subodh Iyengar

Re: [TLS] Can flags be responded to with an extension?

Hi Ekr, On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:56:26AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:43 AM Benjamin Kaduk 40akamai@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:10:43PM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Apr 2022, at 1:51, Benjamin Kaduk >

Re: [TLS] Can flags be responded to with an extension?

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:43 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:10:43PM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > > > > On 14 Apr 2022, at 1:51, Benjamin Kaduk 40akamai@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:56:49AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > >> Consider

Re: [TLS] Can flags be responded to with an extension?

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:10:43PM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > On 14 Apr 2022, at 1:51, Benjamin Kaduk > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:56:49AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Consider the case where the client wants to offer some capability that > >> the server then responds

Re: [TLS] Can flags be responded to with an extension?

Well, sounds like it's an open issue My view is that it should be explicitly allowed, but I don't feel that strongly about it. I do, however, feel strongly that the draft should say explicitly one way or the other. On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:10 AM Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > On 14 Apr 2022, at 1:51,

Re: [TLS] Can flags be responded to with an extension?

> On 14 Apr 2022, at 1:51, Benjamin Kaduk > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:56:49AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> Consider the case where the client wants to offer some capability that >> the server then responds to with real data, rather than just an >> acknowledgement. >> >> For

Re: [TLS] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi! We closed the loop on this one, and Roman wanted to make sure this got back. > On Apr 4, 2021, at 06:57, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker > wrote: > > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14: No Objection > > When

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Hi, Thanks for this draft, which I found interesting and readable. I think it lays out the problem well and proposes a conceptually straightforward solution that will hopefully be less prone to implementation errors than more complex options. However, there are a few points that I think