> It seems like we would be rejecting a good opportunity to make what the
> network operators want work in a better and more secure way, while making it
> harder for passive observers and coercive authorities, to use the same
> mechanism for other purposes. What do we gain? beyond a hollow
as the canary in the coalmine... but
here we are now at least.
- Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Florian Weimer [mailto:f...@deneb.enyo.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 2:17 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns abo
rs.
- Andrew
From: Tony Arcieri [mailto:basc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 4:17 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: Peter Bowen <pzbo...@gmail.com>; tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:
could undermine this solution.
Appreciate it.
- Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Seth David Schoen [mailto:sch...@eff.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 2:30 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns
]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 2:24 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com>; tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:07:28PM +, BITS Security wrote:
> Hi Eric--Thank you
this to our attention.
- Andrew
From: hugok...@gmail.com [mailto:hugok...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Krawczyk
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 7:41 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
If the p
PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>; nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com;
tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
Andrew,
What would probably be most helpful here would be if you tried to describe what
yo
Thanks
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:noloa...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 10:55 AM
>> To: Ackermann, Michael <mackerm...@bcbsm.com>
>> Cc: BITS Security <bit
body (like large
credit card companies in the case of PCI).
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Peter Bowen [mailto:pzbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 7:18 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com>;
ilto:xiaoyi...@outlook.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:00 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>; Salz, Rich
<rs...@akamai.com>; nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
Andrew,
I don't understand wh
onbl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:06 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:19 AM, BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>
wrote:
> To: IETF TL
that will, perhaps sooner
than we might expect, be deprecated.
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:52 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>; Watson Ladd
<watsonbl...@gmail.com>; Ackerm
Rich (et al.) -- I understand where you are coming from but I will poke a
little bit at this portrayal.
We are not here hat-in-hand asking for a return to RSA key exchange to the
proposed standard. We do however want to raise our concern (and hopefully your
awareness) of what appears to be
ncerned about the same unmanageable future they described.
Do Akami, Cloudlflare and Google magically not have these problems?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:noloa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 23,
this functionality, which is a problem
in a TLS 1.3 only environment.
-Andrew
From: Yuhong Bao [mailto:yuhongbao_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:36 PM
To: BITS Security <bitssecur...@fsroundtable.org>; tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Industry Concerns about TLS 1.3
Thi
To: IETF TLS 1.3 Working Group Members
My name is Andrew Kennedy and I work at BITS, the technology policy division of
the Financial Services Roundtable (http://www.fsroundtable.org/bits). My
organization represents approximately 100 of the top 150 US-based financial
services companies
16 matches
Mail list logo